Pages for me to look at


Please take a look on Community Portal. gcardinal 02:45, 20 April 2007 (CEST)

PvXwiki talk:Administrators, fill your info in. -Auron 22:14, 26 April 2007 (CEST)

Sig test

Test. - Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}}


Because of agreement among all four of the Admins as well as all of the users who posted comments on the talk page, PvXwiki:Delete Unfavored Builds previously "Delete Old Builds" has been been made official policy. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:35, 25 April 2007 (CEST)

Sweet, thanks for letting me know. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{Bacon}} 18:57, 25 April 2007 (CEST)

Welcome to BoD

Hey, mate. Saw you joined our guild. Welcome to MEEP. nice to see fellow MEEPers active on the GW Wikis. Ni sigNi 21:01, 26 April 2007 (CEST)

Haha, I just replied to your message welcoming me to MEEP on the forums, too. Thanks again. :P -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{Bacon}} 21:32, 26 April 2007 (CEST)
No love for the Blobulator? :( Although I don't think anyone in the guild knew my "alias"-esque thingy anyway until I got Tia and Armond to join MEEP XD *cough* This is Valen incase you didn't know, although Armond already knows, and then I doubt anyone else will actually read this section, anyway I'll stop now ^_^ Also what's wrong with porting a similar version of my official wiki userpage >.> I don't want to have to come up with another stupid one. I already left the GuildWiki one behind but I'll probably use this wiki. *sigh* --Blobulator 08:14, 5 May 2007 (CEST)
Hey Vallen, I wouldn't have guessed it was you either. You left SiC? And whats the scoop on MEEP? -- BrianG 19:24, 5 May 2007 (CEST)
EDIT: Yeah nevermind >.> After a few days of stupidity I finally got some of it. Disregard me D: --Blobulator 01:06, 6 May 2007 (CEST)


Hah, we're going to delete all archived builds? -Auron 22:19, 30 April 2007 (CEST)

Apparently. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{Bacon}} 22:23, 30 April 2007 (CEST)
We should leave them as historical reference, imo. People may hear the names of the builds being thrown around in-game, and might want to look them up. GWiki doesn't host them anymore, we ought to, if only because no one else is. - Kowal Krowman (talkcontribs) 07:33, 8 May 2007 (CEST)

Hi there, I made a build on this link How do i get it checked? There is no information or useful link to any help on how to get it checked. Many thanks :)


FYI: It looks like you wanted to use a dynamic date, but your edit to Template:Unfavored-build appears to now makes the date static to May 11th. The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) .

Well, yeah, once it becomes not-May 11, 2007, the template will show the date as that not-May 11 date whenever applied. The problem is that all the old templates show May 11, 2007, but once again I say it's possible (at this point I'd even say likely) that all builds will be moved to untested anyway. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 22:57, 11 May 2007 (CEST)
I saw it in the template, not in builds. Looking at the template, it will still show May 11th on the 12th, 13th, 14th, etc. It's coded as the text "11 May 2007", not using any mediawiki codes to generate that date. It's clearly hardcoded. You might want to take another look.
Gotcha. Think I know how to fix it. Thank you! -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 23:06, 11 May 2007 (CEST)
Just checking if you noticed ... it's still static ... if you're inserting a code, it's converting to the static date when you save the page.
AAGH! Ok. This is pissing me off. Thank you for your keen eye. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 23:12, 11 May 2007 (CEST)


Nice job fixing the builds dude ;)/ I would do more..but my comp is at 1 mbps lmao. But anyway, gj :D. Readem (talk*contribs) 23:28, 11 May 2007 (CEST)

I fixed builds? o.O I just want to delete Template:Skills-template and get rid of the whatlinkshere things... -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 23:31, 11 May 2007 (CEST)
More then what I have been doing. Its either you are fixing the builds, or destroying them ;). Readem (talk*contribs) 01:18, 13 May 2007 (CEST)
I try. :D -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 21:07, 13 May 2007 (CEST)

Need a fix

we have a page R/E Firey Quick Shot which needs sorting out, some scrub mucked up the page. Please read for more info. ~~ Napalm Flame Napalm Flame Sig Image 21:36, 13 May 2007 (CEST)

Did I do it right? :D -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 22:38, 13 May 2007 (CEST)

Big big bug...

We have a big error... Lottery script failed when something went wrong @
So now we need to message all the users who got 0 as ticket to re-vote again... User list:

  • (Removed for spacing)

The preceding unsigned comment was added by gcardinal (talk • contribs) .

...That list scares me. I'll get started on letting them know as soon as I can, but I have to run out and do some work in the garden for now. Sorry... Will be back in an hour or two. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 23:33, 13 May 2007 (CEST)
Thanks. I will remove users I have messaged GCardinal 23:36, 13 May 2007 (CEST)
Ok, I got a bunch, someone else's turn. Use {{subst:User:Armond/Revote}} ~~~~. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 02:20, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
I'll get on it. - Kowal Krowman (talkcontribs) 03:22, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
Done. I've got the feeling some of those are sockpuppet accounts, set up to win the Bone Dragon Miniprize. Now, to put some ice on my fingers... - Kowal Krowman (talkcontribs) 03:45, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
Yeh, that is something we need to check (not that I am actually capable of doing so, but Cardinal can probably review the IP addresses or write a short script to compare the addresses. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 03:59, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
The thing I find interesting is that the default option is the farthest in the lead. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 15:51, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
We should make all users state at least one of their IGNs on their user pages. That way, we can check for multiple users using the same account. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 16:58, 14 May 2007 (CEST)

More vandalism

User has been doing some mroe vandalism, including to my user page. Check his contributions for more info. '~\^/~' Napalm Flame Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 15:52, 14 May 2007 (CEST)

See his talk page. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 16:58, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
TYVM, much appreciated, my school (or should I say, all of Thurrock's schools) have a notorious history with vandalising wikipedia. I think the final figure is somewhere around 5000 students, with several hundred vandals. I appreciate stopping this madness. '~\^/~' Napalm Flame Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 17:31, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
As I said, I refuse to have a repeat of my school running around on this wiki. If I had known it was an open IP in the first place, I would have banned him for a week instead of a day the first time, but he still gets the perma-ban. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 20:14, 14 May 2007 (CEST)

Haha thanks for the bad comment on my E-denial build.... it isnt even a E denial build didnt you read the skills.... wither gives -1 energy degen and so does malaise ... but ether lord -2 degen so it gives them 0 regen so.... And EVEN if you delete it... im just gunna post it again... i got all the info saved One step ahead of you..

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.