FANDOM


This is an archive of my talk page, from April 19th, 2007 to June 2nd 2007. Please don't edit it; leave comments and messages on my talk page.

Admin

Please take a look on Community Portal. gcardinal 02:45, 20 April 2007 (CEST)

Yes, please do, I'm sick of not having a reply yet. xP '~\^/~' Napalm Flame Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 00:54, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

Lies

It isn't you. –Ichigo724Ichigo-signature 05:37, 19 April 2007 (CEST)

Shhhh! -Auron 05:37, 19 April 2007 (CEST)

Impossible! O.O you could be an Admin of GuildWiki AND BuildWiki! DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:43, 19 April 2007 (CEST)

But I'm not an admin of either :) -Auron 05:44, 19 April 2007 (CEST)
Well, on my GuildWiki RFA people said I was too focused on builds, now, that's finally a good thing! DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:45, 19 April 2007 (CEST)

Sweet a tutorial on bbcode :-)! Lania Elderfire 06:06, 19 April 2007 (CEST)

gwBBcode is awesome. 195.137.4.228 12:25, 19 April 2007 (CEST)

bbcode

  1. this uses bbcode?
  2. HI!!!

FordSig@v 15:32, 21 April 2007 (CEST)

Yes. -Auron 15:43, 21 April 2007 (CEST)
Also, don't waste your time editing any builds. They're all going to be wiped from this wiki (copyright issues). Hopefully we'll have them all back up in no time. -Auron 15:46, 21 April 2007 (CEST)

Block

Having fun blocking yourself? :-) Lania Elderfire 17:30, 25 April 2007 (CEST)

Yeh, much. I can unblock myself whilst blocked... definitely hax :P -Auron 20:05, 25 April 2007 (CEST)
Hey I can block you on the GWiki and you can see if you can hax0r your way out of that if you'd like ;) --Xasxas256 13:46, 29 April 2007 (CEST)
Gimme a few days, I'll think something up :P -Auron 15:10, 29 April 2007 (CEST)
Scary! --Xasxas256 16:33, 2 May 2007 (CEST)
Psychic was Auron 18:57, 2 May 2007 (CEST)

Policy

Please check out PvXwiki:Policy and vote on some policies. Please do not vote on build vetting policies yet - voting for those will commence on the tenth. In particular, PvX:WELL needs to be addressed. Thank you! -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 01:42, 6 May 2007 (CEST)

I got a question

is one of ur characters name Auron Farplanes???HellbringerP.S. If so ur in my alliance.

Nope. I'm in a French alliance atm (iPod's). -Auron 08:16, 15 May 2007 (CEST)
Yep I saw that ;P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 15:45, 18 May 2007 (CEST)

Hey dude

Um, can you please make you sig at least bold :P. It currently blends in with the white background and the shadows cast upon my computer lol. You are also a sysop, so... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 15:47, 18 May 2007 (CEST)

I picked the current settings carefully. It has a point. -Auron 04:35, 19 May 2007 (CEST)

Coincidence?

"Bcos we don't even have a vetting policy in place? Sign your comments with four tildes btw (~~~~) -Auron 13:37, 20 May 2007 (CEST)" ;-) - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 04:47, 21 May 2007 (CEST)

OBV NOT IMO -Auron 11:17, 21 May 2007 (CEST)

Conjure cripslash

[1] May I direct you to Build talk:W/E Conjure Cripslash#Counters? It's not hard for SoA to reduce the damage from both the conjure and the sword attacks... -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 06:56, 23 May 2007 (CEST)

SoA is prot, prot is generally not listed as a counter (by your logic, SoA is a counter for... pretty much everything, including sins and dervs). Sure, if you autoattack a target and are dumb enough to unleash your combo while SoA is still up, it will be 0 damage; however, remember that the cripslashes point was never to DPS the shit out of your target. You can cripple the target through SoA, and that is your biggest boon - nobody cares if you're doing zip damage for 5 seconds, the covered cripple that you can stack deep wound on is more valuable than autoattack damage. TBFH conjure isn't worth it most of the time, warriors make better use of that 10 energy through shock. I'll reply over there in a sec, moving my laptop around >.< -Auron 10:40, 23 May 2007 (CEST)
Labtop wootage :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:57, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

zomg bored

I have been watching this wiki for over 5 hours and nada rofl. Well anywayz, how does this look? Been using it for a while: Conjure Reaper's Sweep Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:10, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

Sucks. -Auron 07:11, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
I'll go read it now. -Auron 07:11, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
-_-... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:13, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
No apply poison? Wtf d00d i thot u were making a gud dervish! -Auron 07:17, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
Nah, I made an even better one tho! I use Mark of rudgurt and cojur flames! I cuaz burnign! and AoE wit a scythe pwnage. yeah, I am that gud. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:21, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
Meh... I'm not sure about the sup scythe or the earth prayers investment for one skill. Mystic Regen abuse is nice, but not feasible on most derv bars; this one's got some enchantments, but it'll be costly (and probably impossible) to keep them all up and spam your attacks, and spend 10 energy extra just for a healing breeze effect. -Auron 07:23, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
I usually never use Mystic. It's just kinda there O.o. If you alternate Zealous and Fury, E isn't so bad. Besides, in RA and TA, games are to short to worry about E. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:27, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
While you guys are talking about Dervs, would you take a look at this? I was asked to create a decent Avatar of Dwayna build, and this is my shot. My gripes are that it doesn't have a DW or Featherfoot Grace to reduce conditions. On the plus side, it is durable, it is pretty much imprevious to the Icy Shackles ele that every other team is running, other hexers and if it needs to, it can run flags as well. Pair it with a WoR Rit and you might have a potent 2-man. Optional could split atts and get Natural Healing or Harrier's Grasp, Bull's Strike or Distracting Blow, or whatnot. Thanks. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 07:45, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
Avatar of Dwayna Victorious Sweep Eremite&#039;s Attack Wild Blow Pious Haste Frenzy Optional Resurrection Signet

Go see what happens when you put frenzy on a 70 AL target. — Skuld 11:50, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

Needz more heal sig O.o Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 15:48, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

Well, dumping frenzy would be a good start. Wild is not as good, w/ new rec. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 15:52, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

Avatar of Dwayna is shit against hexes, i've tried it, you spend more time removing hexes than you do attacking. Purge Signet is the way to go, and keep a decent avatar (read - melandru). Dwayna is much less damage, and not even that good. — Skuld 23:30, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

/Agree. Though I wonder how Skuld manages to use both Mel and Purge :P. I manage to use it on BA, and RC tho, so maybe... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:45, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

The dervish doesnt use purge, purge is used on the dervish, fool :p — Skuld 10:47, 1 June 2007 (CEST)
I was about to say rofl... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:33, 1 June 2007 (CEST)

I included Frenzy because of its short recharge, basically to help remove Hexes via AoD. You can use it anywhere (i.e. during KD, while attacking, doesn't require a target etc). You could probably put Flurry or possibly even Dash in there to achieve the same effect. Like my user page says, I run AoM almost exclusively, used to run AoG with my Derv. This isn't my fave, but I think it's a decent attempt at AoD. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 00:32, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

Heya

Glad to see you online =) BaineTheBotter 06:13, 27 May 2007 (CEST)

Auron

is pretty hawt. Railin 07:51, 30 May 2007 (CEST)

>.>...sorry had to do that :p. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:52, 30 May 2007 (CEST)
Stop denying it, Readem, we know you agree. -Auron 08:17, 30 May 2007 (CEST)
>.> fine! Auron's hawt then....still eww tho :p. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:41, 31 May 2007 (CEST)
Take it back, must have been high on something rofl to say Auron is hawt :p..I am a guy! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:28, 31 May 2007 (CEST)


Variant question

Build:N/A Virulent Pressure Is my latest brain scheeme. The top build is a Necro pressure support build that accomplishes it's goals. The variant below (at the bottom of the page) uses the exact same engine to achieve some of the similar effects, but runs assasin primary to deal solo spike damage. Can I keep them together or should they be seperated into two seperate builds? Shireen 04:34, 31 May 2007 (CEST)

They're similar enough to keep on the same page. -Auron 05:13, 31 May 2007 (CEST)
Just checking, Thank you. Shireen 05:38, 31 May 2007 (CEST)

Have to admit...

Somehow won 2 glads w/ a Mind Blaster in RA. Fireball is pretty pwnage I must admit. No Healer's either :p Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:37, 31 May 2007 (CEST)

Hey

You cited me for NPA and not spartan? Not cool, man. He insulted multiple people multiple times and i did it once. I'm not appealing my citing in anyway i deserved but really don't care. However i am seeking fair distribution of punishment. For anyone not understanding:http://www.pvxbuilds.com/index.php?title=Build_talk:D/E_Kinetic_Dervish.Dark0805 19:02, 31 May 2007 (CEST)

User talk:Spartan. He did, to a point, but I've taken it a step further. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 02:56, 1 June 2007 (CEST)
Thanks.Dark0805 16:45, 1 June 2007 (CEST)

A Favour?

Theres this build, Build:E/R Winter lightning that I and Naplam think should be deleted, but the user keeps reverting the deletion tags. i violated 1-RV by putting the deletion tag in again, so you can warn me for that if you want. BaineTheBotter 16:37, 1 June 2007 (CEST)

Thanks for bringing admin attention to light. Much appreciated. '~\^/~' Napalm Flame Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 03:07, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
Put admin review tag, not delete. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:33, 1 June 2007 (CEST)
Consider yourself duly warned. I have also posted a note on EverDying's talk page informing him that he cannot continue removing the deletion tag. In the future though, Readem is right, bring it to an Admin's attention rather than reverting the tag. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 20:07, 1 June 2007 (CEST)
No, don't cite him, 1RV doesn't apply to vandalism. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 03:05, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
Removing the tag repeatedly isn't vandalism (in this case). It's not knowing the rules... which isn't an excuse. -Auron 03:14, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Help requested

Any help, regarding these three projects would be greatly appreciated.

  • PvX:NoBias: A policy that states newly written Builds should be unbiased, and create Builds that are not limited by the Author in any way.
  • IW Guide: A Guide describing the basic ideas and concepts of an IW Mesmer.
  • Mass Builds Clean-up: (IMPORTANT) A check list of sorts, for reviewing the legitimacy of Tested Builds.

Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 09:37, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.