FANDOM

(Difference between revisions) | User:Auron
m
m (sup)
Line 146: Line 146:
 
::he has a good point....btw links rule--[[User:Xtreme1ne|<font color="#b22222"><span style="font-family:Book Antiqua;">'''X'''</span></font>]] 00:30, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
 
::he has a good point....btw links rule--[[User:Xtreme1ne|<font color="#b22222"><span style="font-family:Book Antiqua;">'''X'''</span></font>]] 00:30, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Ignoring the fact that the mo/r bar is inferior to boonprot and hardly anyone runs pnh since its nerf (and more importantly patients nerf) and the fact that he took ridiculously bad positions on the builds and started ragewars with me to satisfy his drama craving, c saint is v good player who deserves BM! :< --[[User:TahiriVeila|TahiriVeila]] 00:38, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Ignoring the fact that the mo/r bar is inferior to boonprot and hardly anyone runs pnh since its nerf (and more importantly patients nerf) and the fact that he took ridiculously bad positions on the builds and started ragewars with me to satisfy his drama craving, c saint is v good player who deserves BM! :< --[[User:TahiriVeila|TahiriVeila]] 00:38, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
While you are correct in asserting that some of those links you provided have merit (a few comments in particular demonstrate that you may indeed have an IQ that exceeds room temperature), I'm not exactly inclined to think any differently of you when the links that you, yourself, present as evidence are rife with comments like:
  +
:was never meta, its bad
  +
:no one would ever, ever run this in gvg, its horrible
  +
:ill rephrase. no one would ever ever run this ever.
  +
:because all you retards keeping saying OMG LINEBACK SO EURO WOO LINEBACK LINEBACK
  +
:there is no appeal, readem claims its good, even though no one has or ever will run it because it sucks. and jake is just riding his dick
  +
Maybe this is the type of stuff that passes as legitimate discourse around here these days, but I can't say I'm terribly impressed by it. Simply put, your RFBM failed because not a single person felt compelled to provide a legitimate support vote that wasn't totally ambivalent. [[Image:Defiant Elements Sig Test 2.JPG|50x19px]] [[user:Defiant Elements|<font color=black>'''*Defiant Elements*'''</font>]] [[user talk:Defiant Elements|<font color=darkred><small>''+talk''</small></font>]] 00:55, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:55, October 22, 2009

Wednesday
15
July
06:20 UTC

Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

unacceptable content...

I think Racism and discrimination are not welcome there... [1] Even if those are jokes, they're clearly unaccteptable just by the way they are done. Furthermore, they completely ignored the claims of stopping. Please, remove this userpage... 88.141.130.246 16:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

shut the fuck up you dumb nigger
lol? -Auron 03:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
protip: call your ISP and cancel your internet subscription. ··· Danny Does Drugs 15:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm late, but...racism!?!? where??? ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 23:20, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Question

I know it is okay to delete content if it has no purpose like "first". I was wondering if users forget to sign there contributions would that be acceptable in deleting there comments?Xtreme Hunter 16:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Only if their comments have no purpose. Otherwise, just add an unsigned tag to it and get over it. KJ badge sig 16:22, 20 July 2009
What he said. If the comment has content, even if you disagree with it, it needs to stay. -Auron 21:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Already taken care of. Sorry to drag you here for that. KJ badge sig 21:41, 20 July 2009
TY I was only asking cause of the above comment. We know who did it and it was totally not necessary. Thanks AURON for clearing that up.Xtreme Hunter 11:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Present

File:Auron irl (cute motherfucker + Facebook ling gogo).jpg KJ badge sig 19:26, 3 August 2009

Jethro Tull? Really? And the Eragon series as some of your favorite books? I know it was a long time ago, but damn man..... KJ badge sig 19:43, 3 August 2009
Eragon? They're ok, but I much prefer shannara. My main problem with eragon is the huge bias that is evident throughout the whole series. The elves are portrayed as the superior race, but they're atheist vegetarians and mock those who feel otherwise (dwarves' religion, the main character's meat preference). The series is ok if I try my best to ignore that, but I generally can't.
And yes, I'm a huge tull fan. -Auron 01:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
The first Eragon book was by far the best of the lot. I really wanted to like the series, but the sword thing in book three just made me feel like it had jumped the shark. :/ -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{Bacon}} 05:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Dude, his sword randomly catches on fire. That's so PRO. The heart fo hearts thing was gay though. Life Guardian 05:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
He just so happened to monkey-typewriter the exact name for the damn thing? Yeah, right. Paolini even admitted that wasn't actually in his plan - it was just "something cool" his brother or father suggested. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{Bacon}} 05:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Nah, the stupid part with true names was with sloan. No way he couldve figured that out. Any idea when the fourth one is coming out/what it's called? Life Guardian 05:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Kay so, I need to know. Favourite Tull song? Mine would have to be Cross-eyed Mary, followed closely by Heavy Horses. >.> Ben Tbh 09:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
My God, although I always enjoy Budapest from time to time. Heavy Horses is nice, I liked that era - some of the live versions with Eddie Jobson are excellent. -Auron 10:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Dear Auron God

I'm not disputing that it was a terrible build but can you really just do this. The rest of us will have to deal with the angry autist that made it AthrunAthrun SigFeya 12:36, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Lol. It was make by Ricky. You won't have any problems. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 13:09, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, still an abuse of power though. Guess I'll tag the talk page for deletion... EDIT: ah you did it already. AthrunAthrun SigFeya 13:18, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
I think it lies under the "Furst" law--X 13:45, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
Admin Abuse, good joke --Frosty Mc Admin 15:39, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
Honestly, that happens with builds all the time. If you like you can consider it a WELL tag. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 15:57, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
What was wrong with actually using a WELL tag then? AthrunAthrun SigFeya 16:00, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
He did and instantly deleted it so fast you never saw it. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 16:04, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
Just because i'm female doesn't mean i'm stupid enough to believe that. He could have at least done something useful, like perma lukejohnson. AthrunAthrun SigFeya 16:28, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
No one listens to luke anyways...--Relyk 16:32, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
Funny, Thunda asks me to do that every day. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 17:01, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
Funny you mention that, because whether or not he actually did that is exactly the same as the fact you are a female. It doesn't matter. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 17:05, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
What happend to moving it to user space? It's like being a female...dosen't matter--X 17:09, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
I am still convinced you are mentally handicapped. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 17:12, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
Am sorry to dissapoint you. I have stayed off your user space.--X 17:14, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
I think you're going to have to stay off wiki then--Relyk 17:26, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
K--X 17:28, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

OH MY GOD YOU DELETED MY BUILD JUST LIKE THAT THAT'S NOT ALLOWED OH MY GOD IT WASN'T EVEN WELL'ED OH MY GOD RickyRicksawsmfacevantof 21:31, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Ricky you are like a month late you silly euro. ··· Danny Pew Pew 21:34, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
plus you're wrong cutie, it wasn't my build at all and it was pretty terrible. I just wondered since normal deletions give grace periods or at least warnings. - AthrunFeya Athrun snow sig 21:36, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
Ricksawsmface RickyRicksawsmfacevantof 21:38, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
How dare you imply that I implied that that marvelous piece of magnificence was yours? IT WAS MINE GODDAMN IT!
Lol, Ricky on PvX. Hai. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 21:54, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10405140

go rage at anet for being stupid. bonus points for calling her "reggie." -Auron 16:57, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

i liked foes/grasping on a hench. Gringo 17:00, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
if you like auron-rants, top of page 17 has a good one :p -Auron 17:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
I enjoyed reading through that post, I really can't believe how badly they got all of this wrong. I felt they should have stuck to 20 bars (1 for HA 1 for GvG) and just made them hero friendly but not amazingly good (so, maybe SF Ele in HA since Henchies follow targets, things along those lines). The fact they have Song/Haste and Grasping/Foes on some of the bars really tells you they have no idea what they are doing. --Frosty Mc Admin 17:53, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
I find it funny that they managed to find bars that most players in RA can't properly run, and decided to throw them onto heroes. And on top of that, they've managed to break the game over and over while simultaneously thinking they'll satisfy the (rapidly shrinking) community of players whom are pretty much fed up over the ridiculous skill updates. I'm glad I don't have a Guru account. I'd tear her an ass too. Good going Auron, I lol'd irl. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 18:00, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
new asshole^^ I just woke up. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 18:09, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
[2]. Even under the cc-by-nc-sa license you could actually do that. Claim attribution :p --- VipermagiSig -- (contribs) (talk) 18:52, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
Ohshit can I get monies? Everyone knows I was the first person to use Lingering Curse + Snares in HA amirite? --Frosty Mc Admin 18:56, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
Also tbh, a lot of all the builds that were chosen have a link on PvX, rally every Author and protest! --Frosty Mc Admin 18:57, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
Sounds like fun to me. --- VipermagiSig -- (contribs) (talk) 19:03, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
1 what i said there. — μαφλεσ 23:25, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
those bars are pretty ridiculous for henchman. id agree with maf that the costume brawl builds would work much better... on another note, anet just made 20 people ungodly rich--Relyk 01:52, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
40 --Frosty Mc Admin 02:00, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
They won't be nearly as rich as the people who win the MKG minis this Halloween. ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:10, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Hey, um, just out of curiosity....under our license...couldn't PvX claim that all of the builds that won were, in fact, licensed here....and disqualified or something? I mean, I don't know much about copyright laws, but using copied intellectual property of a site for personal gain is against license, right? Oh, and apparently Anet is going to have the participants sign an agreement saying that they thought up the builds....wouldn't that be....you know...against the law? Karate KJ for sig Jesus 14:08, 4 October 2009

Seeing as how we only "document what's being ran", I don't know how far we'd get with that. ---Mezzy- (talk) -- 14:10, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
I'm not expecting us to. I just want to fuck with Anet. Karate KJ for sig Jesus 14:13, 4 October 2009
Attitude <3 ---Mezzy- (talk) -- 14:19, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
yarr, pretty sure we would have to go after the authors after they sign their little scrap of paper saying their builds were original. we could go after them as a collective. it would make for lulzy headlines in the news. mysterious shadow organization sues random people. — μαφλεσ 17:09, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

broken page

http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Build_talk:Team_-_Discordway

The page exists, but the talk page says it is either deleted or there is a bug int he software GW-Myth 23:20, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

Should be better nao. — Balistic 01:16, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
thanks! GW-Myth 01:58, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
Editing talk still says "You are editing an old version of this page. If you save it, any changes made since this version will be lost." for me. It shows up on a few pages too (don't remember which ones). I just ignore it though. Zyke-Sig 02:03, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
I don't know what causes the "editing old version" thing, I've seen it on a few talk pages so far. I had poke look at it once and he said it was something on wikia's end. -Auron 07:14, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
You can actually go to the discordway talk page now, but the edit buttons on each subsection aren't appearing. Life Guardian 07:22, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
Huh. They are for me though. Zyke-Sig 08:05, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
I don't know what's causing it, but i do know it's fixed by deleteing the page and restoring it, so if you see any other pages like that, jsut drop a note on the AN. ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:14, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

sup

my bm is 17-1 and i have the entire heterosexual BM and male admin staff SOME IMPORTANT PEOPLE. can you please meander on over to it and take a gander. Gringo 15:38, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

technically you dont, if i were to vote i'd vote against, just because. - AthrunFeya Athrun snow sig 18:31, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
I only /support because Saint is so bad at Guild Wars that the resulting conflicts will certainly satisfy my incessant need for drama. ··· Danny Pew Pew 18:49, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
I'm also a male admin and haven't even voted, flawed logic :/. ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:13, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
gah phen i thought you were gone, youve spoiled the entire plan now. fix'd again for you :( Gringo 19:21, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

doesn't it usually help when bms play guild wars saint?--TahiriVeila 20:23, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

actually, no it doesn't. however, it does help if you're not mentally handicapped, and we all know saint isn't allowed out without his helmet. (lolMSN). ··· Danny Pew Pew 21:58, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

I promoted you once. You have done nothing to convince me that you won't ragequit again - and in fact, your answers (along with everyone else's) sort of hint that you will. I am not going to promote you. You'll have to convince DE that you won't ragequit again, because you've done a poor job of convincing me. -Auron 23:58, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

i've never said i wont ragequit again. i said while i was here i would help. every BM leaves eventually. Gringo 00:42, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
That convincing thing Auron talked about - you are bad at it. ··· Danny Pew Pew 21:00, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
everyone leaves sometime. hes just being a dirty nigger over a personal issue. omfg ban me i cursed. Gringo 21:02, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
lol. ··· Danny Pew Pew 21:47, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
if you feel that strongly that you should be promoted you could talk to wizardboy or DE, our other resident BCrats (in that order can I mention, as DE hasn't touched this site in a long time). ~ PheNaxKian talk 22:44, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
DE got on to randomly promote Lau, and I'm fairly certain nobody bothered to contact him, even. Either he happened to stop by at an opportune moment then, or he just doesn't see a reason to promote Saint. I certainly don't know either way. ··· Danny Pew Pew 22:47, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
(EC)the thing is though, they would have to sift through tons of my contributions. and they don't know if im good or not, because theyve been away from GW for so long they don't know mind blast from ether prism. auron refuses to promote me on a personal level. saying "you might leave" is like saying "you might die". its going to happen eventually, sooner for some then others. this is why frosty need bcratship. i brought it to DE and he brushed it off the table. Gringo 22:49, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
Wiz still plays GW on the rare occasion, and he certainly did play often up until Aion was released. There's probably a reason DE brushed it off the table, and there's probably a similar reason that Frosty hasn't gotten a BCrat badge yet. ··· Danny Pew Pew 22:58, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
i meant that i took frosty bcrat to DE and he brushed it off the table, i havent mentioned my BM to him. Gringo 02:58, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

In Saints defense, Auron, you were the one to unBM Skakid when he got permanently banned, and you also were the one to promote him again after his ban was erased. Now I'm asking you; Would you rather have someone a BM who has willingly stopped contributing here, or one who has unwillingly stopped contributing because he got banned? Brandnew 23:13, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

wrc?--TahiriVeila 00:20, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

If someone is looking to see that the promotion isn't going to be a waste of time, the last thing you would say is "yeah i'm gonna leave lol." Just saying. And Gringo, stop being a martyr - if I had something personal against you I wouldn't have promoted you last time. -Auron 01:44, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
how is it possibly a waste of time auron? it takes you 2 seconds to promote me. even if i left after only 1 vote removal or vote after that, it would have been worth your 2 seconds. everyone BM will leave, even if they say they wont (every single one has left thus far, including our active ones). Gringo 02:58, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Hey all. Long time no see. So. With regard to making Frosty a bureaucrat. I personally don't see the need to promote a new bureaucrat as being terribly pressing, so I've not yet communicated with either Auron or Wizardboy. (It doesn't help that I use IRC much less these days and that I hardly ever use MSN anymore.) And frankly, if I was looking to promote a new bureaucrat, my first inclination would be Misery, not Frosty. With regard to the RfBM being discussed on this page, I've yet to see anything even remotely resembling a compelling case being presented in favor of promotion--in spite of the seemingly overwhelming numerical support you've got, most of your supporters seem ambivalent at best--and I don't feel particularly inclined to trust your decision-making abilities from what little I personally have seen from you. Oh, and just for the record, I do still check my watchlist once a week or so. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 03:21, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

With no offense to you, i would appreciate it if you would look through my contribs. Almost all of my edits are in buildspace, and its not just sheer number of edits, its quality. And i have titles/references to back it up. Im here willing to help, and there are a handful people left on the site that are remotely good, and i would say only Crow would be better then me. Gringo 03:37, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
It amuses me to no end that Goldenstar got repromoted, and Saint didn't, even though both of them ragequit not long after they got promoted the first time. Lightningbolt siguɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 09:44, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
Jake got repromoted because he was TahiriVeila, tho I'm unsure if he ragequitted there in between. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 11:50, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
I was BM for ~a year before i ragequit (and i ragequit gws not pvx, b/c ps meta + teashit had me pissed). Came back about 2 months later and DE/Auron wouldn't repromote me. Was sick of dealing with all the bullshit people gave me for my reputation, so i had phen perma my main and made a new acc (I think i told DE/Auron at the time but i can't remember). Anyway, cool story bro!--TahiriVeila 14:13, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
^ Everyone who mattered knew that Tahiri = Goldenstar. ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:23, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
if thats true then the whole "you might ragequit again" is kind of a bad excuse. and jake, i quit gw as well when i left the site fyi. Gringo 21:42, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
You got promoted. You left after a week. Aside from touting a myriad of euro guilds I personally, have never heard of, there is no validity to your claim of guild wars excellence (not even crow will say you are good). For god's sake half the votes supporting your promotion include the word "rage". 2/3 of the votes against you, are actual build masters. You are an unreliable, unqualified, self-serving elitist. Common sense dictates that you do not deserve promotion. --Readem 22:46, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
thats clever how you used statistics bro. when i only have like 3 opposes (one from a pve bm, one from a washed up TA player, and one from a prior supporter), things like "2/3" have much less of an impact. Gringo 23:19, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
and that doesnt change the fact that most of your "supports" are variations of "whatever, who cares". - AthrunFeya Athrun snow sig 23:51, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
My support isn't "whatever who cares," it is "lol saint is bad." That said, no one with any skill posts on PvX (besides Crow), so ups. ··· Danny Pew Pew 18:11, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
Mattering on PvX means you're pro circlejerk. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 10:29, October 21, 2009 (UTC)

hi ben --Readem 03:31, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Sup? Ben..Squint 20:34, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
Not you. DE--TahiriVeila 20:35, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

@Gringo: I took the liberty of reviewing a sample of your contributions to the Build (talk) namespace. Frankly, I was not sufficiently impressed by them to change my opinion. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 23:47, October 21, 2009 (UTC)

You aren't impressed by me fixing/posting builds like this and this? Or was it places where i used reasons to explain why builds were bad/inferior like here and here? Or maybe it was when i explained how to improve builds like here and here. I had a build master harrass me places like here, here, and here, where if my vote didn't match the BM's then it was automatically removed, reasoning or not. I then took action to allow my votes to go through (by posting on the AN and asking admins on MSN to check it out, but they responded by saying "I'm Switzerland in this affair"), and people took my resulting actions as an e-peen war with Tahiri Veila. I know it's a lot of links, but it just seems silly that Jake's harassment and then subsequent move to oppose lost me BM. In before tl;dr and cool story bro. Gringo 00:27, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
he has a good point....btw links rule--X 00:30, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
Ignoring the fact that the mo/r bar is inferior to boonprot and hardly anyone runs pnh since its nerf (and more importantly patients nerf) and the fact that he took ridiculously bad positions on the builds and started ragewars with me to satisfy his drama craving, c saint is v good player who deserves BM! :< --TahiriVeila 00:38, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

While you are correct in asserting that some of those links you provided have merit (a few comments in particular demonstrate that you may indeed have an IQ that exceeds room temperature), I'm not exactly inclined to think any differently of you when the links that you, yourself, present as evidence are rife with comments like:

was never meta, its bad
no one would ever, ever run this in gvg, its horrible
ill rephrase. no one would ever ever run this ever.
because all you retards keeping saying OMG LINEBACK SO EURO WOO LINEBACK LINEBACK
there is no appeal, readem claims its good, even though no one has or ever will run it because it sucks. and jake is just riding his dick

Maybe this is the type of stuff that passes as legitimate discourse around here these days, but I can't say I'm terribly impressed by it. Simply put, your RFBM failed because not a single person felt compelled to provide a legitimate support vote that wasn't totally ambivalent. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 00:55, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.