Hi, thanks for voting on our vetting policies! Unfortunately, there was a slight bug in the system. You have received a lottery number of 0; we need you to go back to Special:Vote and re-vote. Just vote on the same policy again. Thank you! GCardinal 01:11, 14 May 2007 (CEST)

Never remove another user's comments from a talk page, even your own. --Wizardboy777 SigWizardboy777(T/C/Sysop) 12:06, 25 October 2007 (CEST)


can somebody help me fixing my signature? i cant get it to work -.- [[image:Shadowy_Burden.jpg|19px]] 14:20, 4 November 2007 (CET)

(forgot to check raw signature box)

Shadowy Burden 14:25, 4 November 2007 (CET)

Shadowy Burden Darkstone Knight 14:31, 4 November 2007 (CET)

fixed it, how do i upload an image (what to put in destination filename)

i fixed it, thank you for your "help" Image-darkstone knight Sig Darkstone Knight 19:26, 4 November 2007 (CET)

Everyone Does It and It Frustrates Me

In response to your vote on the Lotus Palm:

  • Does only 7 less armor ignoring damage than the SP sin
  • DOES take longer, but makes up for it in durability, slightly better spamability, and is more difficult to stop a chain (can be trigger by hex, condition, or knockdown unlike the single hex that triggers SP's chain)
  • Utilizes two knockdowns, one of which is near guaranteed

In short you are comparing apples to oranges. Yes, they are both fruit, but one has a different flavor, that is to say, they both kill reliably and only differ in method. Don't judge a build by what is currently available, judge it by it's effectiveness.

That being said, I will respect your vote, even if I disagree with it, and this is the last I'll speak of it. --Powersurge 04:37, 9 November 2007 (CET)

I don't want this to be taken as an attack, I just believe your thought process is flawed and I'd like for you to reconsider, no offense is meant. --Powersurge 04:38, 9 November 2007 (CET)
Hey Darkstone, I think I got my picture set up now, is this what you mean?DevinangerDevintomb1 +talk 16:31, 9 November 2007 (CET)

yep, clicking on your picture redericts to your userpage, good job =] Image-darkstone knight Sig Darkstone Knight (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2007 (CET)

Hi--Victoryisyours Sig ImageVictoryisyours 23:38, 13 November 2007 (CET)

hi? Image-darkstone knight Sig DarkstoneKnight (T) 17:16, 14 November 2007 (CET)

sig test Image-darkstone knight SigDarkstoneKnight(T) 18:21, 15 November 2007 (CET)

talk page seems broken.... how to fix Image-darkstone knight SigDarkstoneKnight(T) 18:23, 15 November 2007 (CET)

It isn't. That is because if you create a link to the current page, it doesn't show up as a link. -- 10:04, 1 January 2008 (EST)

That rt/mo

looks epic.(the one on your page). i'l slap strength of honor, maybe judge's insight, and lol at its p00n, seriously, post that up.Dark0805sig2 22:56, 23 November 2007 (CET)

) sure,il post it if i have the time (cant do it now cuz im not allowed to play on the PC) Image-darkstone knight SigDarkstoneKnight 09:42, 25 November 2007 (CET)
I'll take care of it, then. you'll be credited for l337 concept, unless you'd like to credit someone else for it.Dark0805sig2 16:25, 26 November 2007 (CET)
wait you did it.Dark0805sig2 16:26, 26 November 2007 (CET)

duh! Image-darkstone knight SigDarkstoneKnight 21:50, 27 November 2007 (CET)

100 contribs

yay Image-darkstone knight SigDarkstoneKnight 18:44, 3 December 2007 (CET)

Way too conditional falls under univserality.--Holiday viy sigVictoryisSantas 17:56, 22 December 2007 (EST)

i hate the rating system, innovation ftl.
il fix it Image-darkstone knight SigDarkstoneKnight 18:01, 22 December 2007 (EST)


lol!1! j00 r cHeeT0R! lawl lawl !!!1!111! IIIIwan13 11:02, 8 January 2008 (EST)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.