FANDOM

(Difference between revisions) | User:Jaigoda
m (u)
m (u)
Line 136: Line 136:
 
:::Wait, did Jai just write something I agree with? [[User:Karate Jesus|<font color="Black" face="cambria">'''Karate'''</font>]] [[File:KJ for sig.png]] [[User_talk:Karate Jesus|<font color="Black" face="cambria">'''Jesus'''</font>]] <font face="Arial" color="gray" size="1">17:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)</font>
 
:::Wait, did Jai just write something I agree with? [[User:Karate Jesus|<font color="Black" face="cambria">'''Karate'''</font>]] [[File:KJ for sig.png]] [[User_talk:Karate Jesus|<font color="Black" face="cambria">'''Jesus'''</font>]] <font face="Arial" color="gray" size="1">17:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)</font>
 
::::Believe it or not, I'm actually a pretty smart guy. I just have a tendency to make people dislike me on the internet, which basically makes all of my arguments pointless because people aren't listening. PvX is all about bandwagon, and I don't do bandwagon. --[[User talk:Jaigoda|<b><font color="black"> Jai]]</font></b> 17:43, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Believe it or not, I'm actually a pretty smart guy. I just have a tendency to make people dislike me on the internet, which basically makes all of my arguments pointless because people aren't listening. PvX is all about bandwagon, and I don't do bandwagon. --[[User talk:Jaigoda|<b><font color="black"> Jai]]</font></b> 17:43, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Fuck, you're r9. Do you think maybe I could come play HA with you sometime maybe? I'm only r6 but all of my mates say I'm better than r10 people. Hope to hear from you soon! --[[User:Crow|Crow]] 18:02, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:02, August 31, 2010

Vista-file-manager 50x50

Archives


Archive 1
Archive 2

Inb4 Chaos's furst. --Jaigoda endrant Jaiwritesalot . . . 18:00, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

first --AngelusEvertonangelus 18:02, October 6, 2009 (UTC) Mine <3 ---Chaos- (talk) -- 12:29, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

</3 --Jaigoda endrant Jaiwritesalot . . . 18:03, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
suck it up babycakes, i got here furst --AngelusEvertonangelus 18:04, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
Second. </3, I was posting "my" pro Famine/Quicksand build for less RC stalk. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 18:21, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
resume trolling --AngelusEvertonangelus 18:27, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
C:/Chaos/Entertainment/PvX/Bored/Trolling/Faggotry.exe
Error! Missing file C:/Chaos/Entertainment/PvX/Users.dll ---Chaos- (talk) -- 18:31, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
Dead wiki for a dead game is dead :( --Jaigoda endrant Jaiwritesalot . . . 18:32, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
The game is actually not totally dead yet, just living its retirement days. Cancer has started spreading around PvX, the wiener, though. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 18:35, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

socking

lolol. ··· Danny Pew Pew 17:48, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

What is his other user name?--X 18:08, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
He made something about X's and Fire and said "I'm a friend of Jai, no wait, I'm Jai's brother, plz I'm no sock" and got a 3 day ban x) ---Chaos- (talk) -- 18:27, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Fucking Frosty doesn't understand a joke. The name was X Eternal Flame X IIRC. Just a random name that was the first thing I thought up. It was all in good fun, no harm meant (you'll notice the user has exactly 1 edit, so no sock abuse here). --69.244.212.178 19:52, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
He actually lol'd hard at it. Also, may I suggest not proxying or you'll have your ban extended...
But yeah, sock jokes aren't really smart, and they wanted to make sure it stops. 3 days is a pain tho.
Also, l2use proxies before you get banned =/ not after. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 20:04, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Also, maybe frosty just wanted to ban you. ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:09, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
^ this 72.94.131.232 20:11, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Personal bias against users shouldn't play a part in bans, tbh.. Probably not actually the case for PvX, but w/e. Also, gtfo random anon. --69.244.212.178 20:12, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
That's thunda you shitter. l2ip. Also, if he wasn't using personal bias, he should've banned you for a week easy. Socking is one of the few things that's heavily frowned upon here. ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:14, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
One edit with absolutely no attempt for abusing the account warrants a week-long ban? I don't think so. --69.244.212.178 20:19, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
That's not the point you idiot.--TheShortOneKlhksjdnfsig $ɧor₮ talk 20:21, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
^ suck it up and stop being a shitter. the way you're complaining you'd think the cops had just impounded your car. ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:24, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
More like a nigger stole your bike, I don't think Jai's old enough to drive. 72.94.131.232 20:26, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
No worries it was a scraper bike...have some honour and respect your ban--X 21:50, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

Where has my Jai gone? ---Chaos- (talk) -- 10:56, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

He's temporarily back after a long hiatus. What'd the little bastard miss? --Jaigoda endrant Jaiwritesalot . . . 06:07, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
Kk bbz again for a few weeks or something. --Jaigoda endrant Jaiwritesalot . . . 07:28, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
your misuse of "bbz" saddens and annoys me. ··· Danny Hates Snow 09:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Explain yourself :< ---Chaos- (talk) -- 12:27, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

It's My Birthday.

I doubt anyone cares. Just wanted to see if anyone still knows who the hell I am. -- Jai 03:55, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

happy belated b-day bro --Smity the Smith 11:21, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

thx so much

omfg you just saved my ass thx soo much

Lol, don't worry about it. People are forgiving here if you're new and you're not doing anything malicious. Just try to familiarize yourself with the workings of PvX before you do too much more editting, and you'll stay out of trouble. Also, on talk pages you should always sign your name by adding four tildes (~~~~) to the end of your post. You can also just click on the third button from the right on the toolbar above the edit box (it should look like part of a signature). -- Jai 16:55, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

 ?

what do i do?

please

please i just want to poast the build i have no idea how to do that!

Here, I'll do it for you, give me just a minute. -- Jai 16:55, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Okay, the build is at Build:Mo/Me WoH Mimic. Again, let me know if you have questions. -- Jai 17:02, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Is this build stupid joke?--GodFocused AngerKamil 13:11, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
No, you're just retarded. I was trying to help the person get his build in the right place on PvX, because he was trying to put it. I knew the build was going to get trashed, but I wanted the noob to at least get some good experience out of it and maybe learn something. But whatever, the PvXfags like you found it too quickly, and eventually Danny did turn it into a joke. I should have known better, but it doesn't really matter.
Lol, looking at the build today, I'm laughing even more. -- Jai 14:33, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
You dumb shit. Move it back66.45.240.66 16:18, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

ahahahahah, its your build, wat a sorry excuse, a friend that cudnt post it??? ahahahahha 82.154.7.29 16:26, August 11, 2010 (UTC)enormous, back on old ip

Oh, how I only wish I had the genius to have created such an amazing build. I am simply grateful I could have had a hand in its making, and was able to assist the creator, Vipers356, in his endeavors. -- Jai 16:38, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Whoru? Move what back? -- Jai 16:38, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Be less shit at both logic and trolling, stuff like that happens every day here. Also sir, you seem to suck at wikicode, you need to put 2 linebreaks before it shows as you want it ^_^ ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 17:53, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
<3 -- Jai 18:27, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

[1]

It was fucking epic ;p Shouldn't have removed! ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 19:41, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

I know, but being able to remove it was even more epic, to me at least. Revert it if you really want to, I don't care too much. But it was flame bait anyway, tbh. -- Jai 14:35, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
The aftermath is dull, so it doesn't really matter. ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 18:06, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Phenax

I reverted Tehiri's edit, he reverted mine, I reverted again and said 1RV. How am I the one at fault here? -- Jai 19:31, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

you reverted twice, that's how. you said it yourself =/. ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:34, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Jake already also reverted a revert, which iirc is what the rule says. Him saying 1RV and reverting actually seems like he thinks he can revert Jake for breaking RV1. I'd probably drop a whine about banning people who don't comprehend policy, but it's just 1 day and nobody cares. ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 19:36, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
I'd say it's more an issue of Spirit vs the word. Personally I think reverting a revert is fine (in a situation between 2 users only). ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:40, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
(EC)Either way, Tahiri is more at fault than I am. I reverted once, then he reverted my edit (which, AFAIK, would be the first to break 1RV), and then I reverted his edit because I assumed he had made the edit in violation of a policy and was thus acceptable to remove. If I am misunderstanding the policy, then I think that would fall under ignorance, which I believe is generally not punished by bans. -- Jai 19:43, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
....swing and a miss. Read what i said again:
"I think reverting a revert is fine"
that to me is "you each get 1 revert" (but like i said, spirit vs word).
so...you broke 1RV because you thought it was OK to revert a policy violation of 1RV, that you were involved in...
That's not entirely true, we do ban for ignorance because we expect people to have read our policies (but i understand you're meaning in this context).
I will unban you on the condition that instead of getting back into a revert war, talk on the builds talk page =/. ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:48, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Uh, I think my IP has still been blocked. Is it possible to fix that? -- Jai 22:03, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
try now. ~ PheNaxKian talk 22:31, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
1RV, 1 Revert, you are allowed, 1, Re, Vert. You break the policy when you revert more than (you guessed it), once. Frosty 22:29, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
I actually think that PvX says "Don't revert a revert" whereas GWW says "Only revert once". I won't be checking it, though, because it's more fun like this! ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 14:27, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Yeaaah, pretty sure people are confusing PvX and GWW policy here, but PvX policy has an extra clause "unless you are right". If you are wrong you get pretty fucked though. I don't even know what this is about, but that is how policy has always been interpreted. Misery 15:07, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Ok, so for future reference, could you tell us exactly what the policy says you can and can not do when reverting? -- Jai 15:53, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Or you could read the policy? Misery 15:56, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
I did read it, obviously. I should probably reword that to "could you tell us exactly will get you banned when reverting?" -- Jai 18:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
I believe it's when you break the policy on reverting--Relyk talk 23:01, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Then why wasn't Jake banned? He was the first to break the policy. And he should know better. -- Jai 23:26, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
History says he only reverted once. You did twice. The original adding of the well tag does not count as a revert, obviously. ToraenTheJanitorToraenSig2 23:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Also, this is kinda trumped anyway by Do not remove this tag from builds you authored unless a consensus has been reached on the talk page. ToraenTheJanitorToraenSig2 23:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
(EC)First of all, you removed the well tag from your own build (which in itself isn't allowed), you didn't revert his edit. We assumed good faith about the addition and removal of the well tag. You will note this in the exception clause of the 1RV policy. He reverted your removal of the well tag because "Stop being bad Jake" is a terrible reason. At that point, instead of bringing it up on the talk page because the well became contested, you reverted the reversion and committed 1RV. Anything not clear on why you should've listened to common sense?--Relyk talk 23:47, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

You still

Suck at making build pages. =\ Zyke-Sig 03:39, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Care to explain? Where did I screw up? -- Jai 04:14, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Oh wait, I'm retarded. Zyke-Sig 04:43, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
That's okay. You fit right in on PvX. :) -- Jai 12:38, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Okay, thanks Jai. ^^ Also, I uploaded the reasoning on Misery's talk page. Angueo 03:56, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

[2]

care to explain? ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:28, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Ups. It might have had something to do with having reopened my browser while I was still editting the page. Probably didn't save the summary line, so it replaced the entire page with the section I was editting. Something like that. Sorry, and thanks for fixing it for me. -- Jai 19:53, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

u

stop vandalizing mesway, its there for people who dont have DPS or FoMF, capishe? The Scythe User The Scythe Has Fallen Sig2 Has Fallen 15:45, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

We store builds here with the optimal skills. The assumption is that people are smart enough to realize that if they don't have DPS or FoMF, then they can add another rez. We try to give readers the benefit of the doubt. There's no reason for 4 optional rez skills. Karate KJ for sig Jesus 15:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
w/e feel free to remove teh bad shitz, i was listing pretty much everything that can work even a lil The Scythe User The Scythe Has Fallen Sig2 Has Fallen 16:27, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Fail less please. -- Jai 16:31, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
i have a gwamm + a R9, i kno PvE & PvP. be less baed The Scythe User The Scythe Has Fallen Sig2 Has Fallen 16:34, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Wait, GWAMM is hard? Also, I thought everyone (who wasn't banned) has r9.... Karate KJ for sig Jesus 16:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Fail less please, and get off my talk page. -- Jai 17:04, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
considering my first acc was banned, and my second is a R9 (1.5yr acc.) AND has a gwamm, id say im doin pretty decent. Also, gwamm isnt "hard" it just takes forever The Scythe User The Scythe Has Fallen Sig2 Has Fallen 17:13, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
I think "religious scientists" is a perfect analogy about how rank just means you work hard. If diplomas would be awarded for getting PvE titles then they would be perfect for wiping your ass with, though I guess the paper will be about as cheap as the title ^__^ So ye ups. --DANDY ^_^ -- 17:30, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Shit guys he's r9 holdin dem hallz, gotta listen to this geeza. Frosty 17:22, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

sadly, i monk, no party lead wins >__< The Scythe User The Scythe Has Fallen Sig2 Has Fallen 17:33, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
A retard could play for 10,000 hours and get a couple GWAMM's, but that doesn't mean they're better at making builds than someone who's played for 1,000 hours and actually understands the game. Time means very little in terms of skill and intelligence. -- Jai 17:37, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Wait, did Jai just write something I agree with? Karate KJ for sig Jesus 17:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Believe it or not, I'm actually a pretty smart guy. I just have a tendency to make people dislike me on the internet, which basically makes all of my arguments pointless because people aren't listening. PvX is all about bandwagon, and I don't do bandwagon. -- Jai 17:43, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Fuck, you're r9. Do you think maybe I could come play HA with you sometime maybe? I'm only r6 but all of my mates say I'm better than r10 people. Hope to hear from you soon! --Crow 18:02, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.