FANDOM


m
m ([http://www.pvxwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Build:R/Me_Extended_Concussion_Sniper&action=rate])
Line 43: Line 43:
   
 
:PvX hardly writes the meta. You don't see Tommy on here, Ensign had like 3 contribs and never showed up again. We simply whore Obs mode and write down what we see to share it with others. Vetting is far from black-and-white. If it was black-and-white, we would have 2 categories: Trash and Great. Nothing else. Instead, we have Trash, Other, Good, and Great. 4 categories to rate effectiveness. One opinion doesn't outweight 7 opinions, that's a fact. If you find our vetting to be too "harsh" for you, perhaps a [http://www.gamependium.com site with lower expectations] would suit you. --[[Image:GoD Wario Sig.PNG]]<font color="Black"><small>*[[user talk:Guild of Deals|<font color="purple">'''Wah'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Guild of Deals|<font color="DAA520">'''Wah'''</font>]] <font color="purple">'''Wah!'''</font>*</small></font> 10:56, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
 
:PvX hardly writes the meta. You don't see Tommy on here, Ensign had like 3 contribs and never showed up again. We simply whore Obs mode and write down what we see to share it with others. Vetting is far from black-and-white. If it was black-and-white, we would have 2 categories: Trash and Great. Nothing else. Instead, we have Trash, Other, Good, and Great. 4 categories to rate effectiveness. One opinion doesn't outweight 7 opinions, that's a fact. If you find our vetting to be too "harsh" for you, perhaps a [http://www.gamependium.com site with lower expectations] would suit you. --[[Image:GoD Wario Sig.PNG]]<font color="Black"><small>*[[user talk:Guild of Deals|<font color="purple">'''Wah'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Guild of Deals|<font color="DAA520">'''Wah'''</font>]] <font color="purple">'''Wah!'''</font>*</small></font> 10:56, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
  +
::Haha, no thanks on the other site. But I get the point. I already apologized and I will continue to if I have to. I will vett closer to what the "pros" do from now on. I'll give something all 0's even if I don't think it deserves it, if it makes you guys happy. I'm just tired of being attacked. So, can we be done with the personal stuff now? [[User:Karate Jesus|Karate Jesus]] 11:02, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:02, August 13, 2008

Rt/A Spirit's Strength Daggers (talk · rate)

Go to the voter' s talkpage and explain why his vote is to low/wrong if that has been done and his vote is still obvious wrong go to the AN (this all just because the Build masters like to see some discussion before deleting) Fox007 User Fox007 sig 18:00, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Most of the votes need obvious deleting tbh Frosty No U! 18:02, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
I'm sorry, I'll make sure and do that next time, but honestly, Frosty is right. All of the votes need to be re-thought because they all DIDN'T READ THE BUILD....except for Frosty. Karate Jesus 18:04, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
Even i didn't read all the build at first, but with 75AL, there is no reason not to run this, 200 damage Blades of Steel is fucking epic. Makes me like those poopy SS'ers now. Frosty No U! 18:06, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
You're damn right it's epic. Karate Jesus 18:07, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Your Sig

Must say your user name somewhere in your sig. I forgot which policy it is. --19pxAngelus(mcpiplup) 18:29, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

Ok, i'll change it. Karate Jesus 18:30, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
You can keep the same style and everything, just add your name somehwere in there --19pxAngelus(mcpiplup) 18:33, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

Karate, What about this =

<pvxbig> [build prof=Warrior/Dervish HammerMastery=11+1+1 Strength=10+1 WindPrayers=10][Devastating Hammer][Crushing Blow][Heavy Blow]["None Shall Pass!"][Frenzy][Rush][Natural Healing][Resurrection Signet][/build] </pvxbig>

Frenzy? No or Yes?

Frenzy is fine, but the build still isn't great. None Shall Pass is kind of a crappy skill really and there are a lot of KD hammer builds that do more damage and heal easier. Sorry bud. Karate Jesus 20:23, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
Oh and honestly, I prefer the Flail/Enraging Charge combo. Karate Jesus 20:25, 12 August 2008 (EDT)


<pvxbig> [build prof=Ranger/Ritualist WildernessSurvival=12+1+1 Marksmanship=7+2 Expertise=7+1 Communing=7][Forked Arrow][Dual Shot][Incendiary Arrows][Ignite Arrows][Splinter Weapon][Favorable Winds][Troll Unguent][Natural Stride][/build] </pvxbig>

LAWL!!!! TALK ABOUT 2 MINS OF THROWING SKILLS TOGETHER Jjberks 20:55, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

[1]

Don't break RV1. You've reapplied your voting with near-exact reasoning twice despite a BM removing it with true reasoning. --GoD Wario Sig*Wah Wah Wah!* 10:25, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

Sorry, but I don't care. I'm going to continue to apply my vote until it is allowed to stand fairly. Karate Jesus 10:27, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
Then you will get banned and can't vote. Since you've clearly disregarded my warning, time to go to Admin noticeboard. --GoD Wario Sig*Wah Wah Wah!* 10:28, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
Have fun, asshole. Karate Jesus 10:34, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
NPA too? You're on a roll.--Blackened SigBlackened 10:35, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
^. So, I'm the kettle and you're the pot then? Continue disregarding general policy and you'll receive a ban. It's ONE build. Just because you like it doesn't mean an entire Wiki bows down to your favor. --GoD Wario Sig*Wah Wah Wah!* 10:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
Look, I'm not trying to bend anyone to my favor. And I wasn't trying to piss all of you off. I was just trying to give the build the rating I felt it deserved - Fair. Ok? I didn't mean to attack you GoD, sorry about that. I just want to see less elitism on pvxwiki (by which I mean people voting it great just because their buddy made the build) and more fair representation of what the builds actually are. I don't know the author of this build, and the build isn't great, but I still think it deserves a fair rating. Karate Jesus 10:42, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

Some People care about the principle of the matter. I'd have to agree that vetting on PvX seems to be really harsh (very few builds should ever get 0-0-0 in my opinion). If vetters and admins weren't so black-or-white in their judging you'd probably see alot more diverse builds on PvX which would lead to more diverse builds in GW which would lead to people experimenting and creating even more, new, fun builds. Then maybe we'll see something new in the meta.ComfortOsprey 10:51, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

And I'm one of those people. I would love to see more diversity in GW builds. And for a lot of people who make builds in-game, this is the starting place for ideas. But when they have an idea that's not represented here, they assume it can't work. I'd like to see more fun/do-able ideas, instead of cookie-cutter imba builds. Making builds can be fun, you know? Karate Jesus 10:54, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
PvX hardly writes the meta. You don't see Tommy on here, Ensign had like 3 contribs and never showed up again. We simply whore Obs mode and write down what we see to share it with others. Vetting is far from black-and-white. If it was black-and-white, we would have 2 categories: Trash and Great. Nothing else. Instead, we have Trash, Other, Good, and Great. 4 categories to rate effectiveness. One opinion doesn't outweight 7 opinions, that's a fact. If you find our vetting to be too "harsh" for you, perhaps a site with lower expectations would suit you. --GoD Wario Sig*Wah Wah Wah!* 10:56, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
Haha, no thanks on the other site. But I get the point. I already apologized and I will continue to if I have to. I will vett closer to what the "pros" do from now on. I'll give something all 0's even if I don't think it deserves it, if it makes you guys happy. I'm just tired of being attacked. So, can we be done with the personal stuff now? Karate Jesus 11:02, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.