FANDOM


(Real Discussion)
(Real Discussion)
Line 79: Line 79:
 
::Not anymore (12s recharge) [[User:Mgrinshpon|<font color="green">'''—ǥrɩɳsɧ'''</font>]][[User talk:Mgrinshpon|<font color="red">'''ƿoɲ'''</font>]] 01:34, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
 
::Not anymore (12s recharge) [[User:Mgrinshpon|<font color="green">'''—ǥrɩɳsɧ'''</font>]][[User talk:Mgrinshpon|<font color="red">'''ƿoɲ'''</font>]] 01:34, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
 
:::New epic fail. Paragons. Izzy has nerfed them too far now. Only hope for them is either that shitty HB R/P build (which isn't even a proper para) or a flailing P/W. ~~ [[User:Napalm Flame|'''<font color=#ff0000>Napalm Flame</font>''']] >=] [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] <small><font color=#0000ff>[[User_talk:Napalm Flame|(talk)]]·[[Special:Contributions/Napalm Flame|(contributions)]]</font></small> 14:37, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
 
:::New epic fail. Paragons. Izzy has nerfed them too far now. Only hope for them is either that shitty HB R/P build (which isn't even a proper para) or a flailing P/W. ~~ [[User:Napalm Flame|'''<font color=#ff0000>Napalm Flame</font>''']] >=] [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] <small><font color=#0000ff>[[User_talk:Napalm Flame|(talk)]]·[[Special:Contributions/Napalm Flame|(contributions)]]</font></small> 14:37, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
  +
:Not really. Paras are still warrior-esque DPS with nerfed energy management this is still stupidly strong, and theyve lost 20 armor from their base of 80+16+16. [[Image:Ibreaktoilets_Signature.jpg|User:Ibreaktoilets]][[User:Ibreaktoilets|<font color="Blue">'''Ibreaktoilets'''</font>]] 15:22, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 13:22, October 14, 2007

Quick Links Suggestion

Always sign your comments! (~~~~)

  • Warriors that don't use healing hands. Rawrawr Dinosaurdark fails 14:51, 16 September 2007 (CEST)
  • Srsly, if you use Healing Hands, you can't use Hamstring and Fire Storm. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 14:52, 16 September 2007 (CEST)
  • lol u tk him 2 da bar|? AND I'm using IE :P I fail twice! This page is great ^_^ --Wizardboy777 01:02, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
  • Oh, and, you fail, too. You forgot mending. --Wizardboy777 01:02, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
  • Scavenger's Focus :D :O :S :) :( :P ;) :@ <-- random emo's :D ----InfestedHydralisk Shadow Prison 20:13, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
  • Splinter Weapon isn't fail in Barragers... ~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 21:00, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
    • It's also awesome and hence popular on a support Rit. — Hyperion` // talk 21:29, 25 September 2007 (CEST)
  • Yeah, I don't even know what I was thinking there. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 21:36, 25 September 2007 (CEST)
  • tbh, alliances mean nothing whatsoever. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 15:44, 23 September 2007 (CEST)
  • I know, but fueling the fire is and stays fun... -StarSeeker | My talk 17:39, 24 September 2007 (CEST)
  • According to this thing, you failing because you give even half a shit about either of these. Sorry pal :/ —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 21:36, 25 September 2007 (CEST)
  • Never said I cared, right? And 'giving half a shit' isnt listed either :p Sorry, pal. -StarSeeker | My talk 22:58, 25 September 2007 (CEST)
  • He means giving half a shit about luxons or kurzicks ----InfestedHydralisk Shadow Prison 10:06, 26 September 2007 (CEST)
  • Giving half a shit is listed now :P --Wizardboy777 SigWizardboy777(T/C) 18:40, 26 September 2007 (CEST)
  • It was there, but it wasn't phrased very well. I took the liberty of fixing that. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 21:13, 26 September 2007 (CEST)
  • If you don't give half a shit about luxon/kurz, why the hell do you have an entire coordinated team build for it?... :D.*cough* scottyway *cough*.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 05:28, 27 September 2007 (CEST)
  • From the page: Builds for Alliance Battles. Run with 3 other guild members with voice communication for great justice. Helps build teamwork and coordination that is useful in GvG and makes a great introduction to the world of higher end PvP. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 01:14, 3 October 2007 (CEST)
  • Not to say it's the worst AB team build I've ever seen. Saz 01:14, 03 October 2007 (CEST)
  • I concur. big word alert!!! cheese used a big word, the world is going to end.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 03:28, 3 October 2007 (CEST)
  • ZOMGZ! Cheese used a 6-letter word! ZOMGZ! ^_^ --Wizardboy777 SigWizardboy777(T/C) 03:59, 3 October 2007 (CEST)
  • lol, stressing of weird words. --Powersurge 17:42, 7 October 2007 (CEST)

Real Discussion

quick reference for failing = nightmare wep + vampiric assault builds.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 05:45, 5 October 2007 (CEST)

Well, only the builds that have been created now suck yes. Maybe if someones makes a wonder build with it, then it's better :D ----InfestedHydralisk Shadow Prison 14:26, 5 October 2007 (CEST)
no its just baed.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 00:17, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
Done. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 00:20, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

Ritualist healers. Dervish healers too. --InternetLOL 00:24, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

Dervish healers, yes they suck. Ritualist healers, no they don't suck. Oh and btw, Amity ftw ----InfestedHydralisk Shadow Prison 00:26, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

They don't suck, but monks do it better, especially in RA. --InternetLOL 00:28, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
True, but why are you referring rit healers for failing then? :P ----InfestedHydralisk Shadow Prison 00:51, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
22 rounds of RA last night. Nine ritualist healers. No monks. --InternetLOL 02:10, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

signet based builds. Holy Satish 02:14, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

Assassins not using daggers.--Victory is Mine! Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 02:51, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

Dancing Daggers says hi. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 02:54, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
Lol,ok? I meant an assassin using a scythe with high critical hit rate, or an assassin with an axe etc.--Victory is Mine! Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 02:55, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
Dark Apostasy and Called Shot say hi. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 02:57, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
I dont get it...--Victory is Mine! Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 02:59, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
Courtesy of Defiant Elements. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 03:30, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
DE > you.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 03:36, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

death by conditions. Holy Satish 06:42, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

Also known as nubs in RA who don't have a self-heal and get killed by parasitic bond o_O --Wizardboy777 SigWizardboy777(T/C) 08:54, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

Not using fire magic in pve — Skakid9090 17:28, 7 October 2007 (CEST)

Don't forget "Using Searing Flames in EotN". Or just "using Searing Flames". --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 17:46, 7 October 2007 (CEST)
Wastrel's Collapse for sure.--Victoryisyours Sig ImageVictoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 02:55, 8 October 2007 (CEST)

Shell Shock on Warriors — Skakid9090 05:07, 11 October 2007 (CEST)

not sure if this is already on there, but spirits strength rits.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 05:14, 11 October 2007 (CEST)

Barrage in RA, Aura of Resto Warriors, wanna-be monks that are eles, Word of Healing in RA, Archane Eco Shadow Form noobs who cant do damage for crap and think they're high and all mighty because they can't get attacked. I'll keep the list coming Shield of Deflection Hide-And-Seek 16:59, 13 October 2007 (CEST)

Life Transfer. 76.19.223.231 23:09, 13 October 2007 (CEST)
Don't you mean Aura of Resto instead of Aura of Resto warriors? Also, eles that are wanna-be monks ownz. SoR water flagger iz gud, rite? --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 01:02, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
Not anymore (12s recharge) —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 01:34, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
New epic fail. Paragons. Izzy has nerfed them too far now. Only hope for them is either that shitty HB R/P build (which isn't even a proper para) or a flailing P/W. ~~ Napalm Flame >=] Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 14:37, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
Not really. Paras are still warrior-esque DPS with nerfed energy management this is still stupidly strong, and theyve lost 20 armor from their base of 80+16+16. Ibreaktoilets SignatureIbreaktoilets 15:22, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.