FANDOM


Archive 1

Your comments on User talk:65.95.233.58

are unacceptable. You know about NPA and still blatantly violated it, and are probably expecting punishment. Well... here it is. I'm blocking you for a day for your rudeness etc. Please review PW:NPA and feel free to come back tomorrow with a more positive attitude. -Auron 08:02, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

Ignore his comments

Look here and here - Skakid9090 18:57, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

Hahaha, been waiting to say this, but this guy needs to get off his high horse and smell the ashes, or more typically, his shit, since he seems to think it doesn't stink. Even my dual attune stone dagger spammer wasn't THAT bad!

And for my own personal reference, this is what I'm going to put on Omigawa's talk in 1 week's time.

'Firstly, in response to your pathetic message, we ARE a community. Or were, until you stepped in. There are unfavoured builds, but currently we are still implementing our vetting policy, as this current database is all taken from guildwiki before the wipe (about 5 minutes before, am I correct?) And as for deserving no kindness, too right too, you won't get kindness OR respect if you step into the community and start acting like a fool. Just for the record, I really meant this. [[1]] And just to tell you, no-one likes RA critics that can't even make builds anyway.

I reckon you could call completing every single zone, every single quest and every single mission to masters and on top of that fully vanquishing hard mode in Nightfall being MORE than just 'adept' at playing an Elementalist. And that's just one character, there's more like that.

You also say there are no 'classes'. What's a Monk then? A class. An Elementalist? A class. A WARRIOR? A CLASS. 'Nuff said. Sure, you can be 'specialised', and excel in just one character, but some people are just naturally good, and go together like it's natural. More like me with shooting games really, which is my number 1 point.

Admittently, warriors are versatile, but warriors, the most important roles? That's the funniest thing I've ever heard. Right, one thing you don't get. What's the most important three things in PvE, huh? A tank, a nuker and a monk (whether prot or heal or a hybrid depends on the situation). And guess what makes the best tanks? Let's see... Best tank classes... I don't see Warriors to be too hot in the spotlight, maybe dolyak signet and a few other armor boosts but with such poor energy regeneration and such a small pool warriors just don't beat an E/Me, or an E/Mo (If no prot monk is present), or an E/D, or a D/E. Notice the centre of all those? Earth Magic.

And just to break it to you, spiking doesn't make you good. And we defend builds which work, unlike what you have produced, which is enough for me to say GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE.

But anyways, I've had my say, my words have clearly been taken into consideration by everyone (Even the admins) and I'm just gonna ignore this 'stuck-up snob', which by his actions is what he seems to be. The hated shall remain ignored.'

Like? And this shouldn't (and doesn't) breach NPA in any way. If it does, then NPA isn't what I think it is. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 17:04, 13 June 2007 (EDT)

Technically it can be considered an attack against him, even if it was provoked. You may wanna less attackify ur stuff (just a tad) And ftr, he was banned 3 days, THEN a week for ban evasion (kinda). But seriously, I say let it die. If after that week, Omigawa starts his usual doings, then maybe you can post this to point it out. If the dude has changed/doesn't return, don't pester him. I'm not trying to attack you, that's just my 2¢. ‽-(єronħ) no u 17:14, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
Okay, good advice, I'll strike that line and if he starts throwing his ego around I'll dump it on his page. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 17:17, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
The thing is, NPA was created, if I'm correct, to stop bickering/arguing/etc. You yelling at him to get off his high horse will make him yell at you that he's not on his high horse (whether or not he is), and while he's at it he'll yell at you that there isn't any such thing as classes, just professions, and he'll yell at you for some other things and you'll yell right back and yadda yadda yadda, you'll both likely be banned for a few days for disrupting the wiki community. This applies to everyone, mind you. Now then, off to investigate this Omigawa person. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 14:37, 16 June 2007 (EDT)
Well after all, doesn't professions=classes? Elementalist = profession = class. I think? Or have I got the wrong end of the pointy stick? ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 20:54, 16 June 2007 (EDT)
For people who play more than guild wars, yes. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 04:39, 23 July 2007 (CEST)

help

Please check it out Help needed. Thx :)

voting

5 votes are needed for a category change. - Skakid9090 21:40, 8 July 2007 (CEST)

But once it has more than 5 votes if it was previously on 4.4 but then moved up to 4.5 then it moves to the new category. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 22:47, 8 July 2007 (CEST)
yeah? i only reverted your changes where there was less than 5 votes. - Skakid9090 06:38, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

ty

Keep in namespace.
Hp vote This user tends to make negative, derogatory, immature or insultive posts. Please do not be offended by this user's bad attitude.
Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:32, 10 July 2007 (CEST)
No probs, I'm just saying peeps should use it wisely. xP ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 17:05, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

btw voting badly on my builds because you don't like me is childish. - Skakid9090 01:07, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

...No, it's got nothing to do with that, it's because the build is just crap. Like you say that bonder is, I don't think your build warrants its own page, should go under nuker. And besides, you have such a negative attitude to everything, you are completely negative and fail to make many constructive comments. Though a couple of your builds are bloody good though. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:09, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

nah im just a realist. we have way to many similar tested builds and we need to clear some up. the sor is the best bonder i agree but its totally unecessary, a build like Build:Mo/any RA Bonder would be great. - Skakid9090 01:11, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Or to just give the bonder it's own special page called 'Bonder' which can explain how they work in RA, TA, PvE and Fort Aspenwood. Willing to start it so I can get to work on a 'Nuker' page? xP ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:12, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
Yeah I don't think stuff like that belong in the mainspace, Guide:Bonder could work too. btw the e/me build is for deep/urgoz/ect. where you need a ton of knockdowns. the long cast times are usually cut by 20/20/20/20 wand offhands. i'll start that build i guess. - Skakid9090 01:15, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
I was a bit tight with my ratings, but the build is not a good PvP build, in AB or CM all you need is a smart interrupting ranger (like me) and I would make your day hell, and I would stop GoR from working on MS too. And on RI. Maybe on Fireball too. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:18, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
eek why tf did i mark that for AB/CM - Skakid9090 01:20, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
You must have been drunk. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:20, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Boon sig? 0.o - Skakid9090 01:45, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Uh huh, energy gain galore when used on yourself. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:48, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
Shouldnt waste an elite on e-management when you could do it with a non-elite imo. - Skakid9090 01:49, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
Still a viable option and a cheap self-heal. I'm just providing every feasible option available. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:51, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
try to keep it on the good ones =P Skakid9090 01:52, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
I've played bonders enough to know just which elites can work when used well. I mean, DH and RC are also viable. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:52, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

favored! high-five! - Skakid9090 23:13, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

Fucking hell, WAS IT? NICE WORK MAN WE ROCK! W00T! ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 00:12, 15 July 2007 (CEST)

External Links

Why? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:46, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

I have NO idea. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 02:46, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
Fix? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:47, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
Dunno what needs it, but why not. I don't think I need those actually, gonna remove teh links and add tag... ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 02:48, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Touch Ranger

By this point in time, the touch ranger is a well knon build, it's counters also well known. It can only transfer cripple if at touch range, which pretty much goes against the point of crippling them in the first place. A snare hex or ranged cripple literally eliminates a touch ranger. I didn't just give it a bad rating because it's irritating to play against(heck i gave the SP/TS assassin a perfect score) but it is way to easy to counter, and it's counter don't just inhibit it, they destroy it. Bob fregman

Do you know how many RA or TA players can counter a toucher? Not many. And besides, touch rangers are primarily PvE builds, making what you said semi-redundant. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 03:07, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Very difficult to counter actually. You can say snare or blind to counter any melee-build, or daze for any caster. If that's its only counter, it is one of the best damn builds we have. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:08, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

It's actually a... FUCKING AMAZING build, but it's only good point really is it's a bitch to kill, or prevent damage from. It's not even powerful, so a decent player with a powerful melee build can do more damage than this. It's just the survivability and newb-friendliness that makes this special. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 03:11, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Ok, ill give it to you, i didn't realize that it's main purpose is pve and scrub pvp, i was still going back to the days where touch teams did HA. Since it's not listed for high end pvp, i won't say anything else.Bob fregman

Yeah, thanks. Yeah, noobs in GvG and HA playing touchers are just dumb. You sometimes see toucher teams in TA, and a good team can overcome their low amount of DPS, and their not-so-hot e-management. Touchers are good in PvE though, especially against high AL foes. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 14:17, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

[2] Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:18, 15 July 2007 (CEST)

Seen it, bloody amazing how a team of 8 touchers could outsmart a top guild. Heh, they don't notice the gank until it's too late and by then the guild lord is skrewed. It's impressive that such a no-skill build is so good. Well, it's that they played it well, and their strategy and tactics were very impressive. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 00:19, 15 July 2007 (CEST)
Actually :/, iQ made the touch ranger so...they just kinda got bitch slapped by their own Build lulz. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:21, 15 July 2007 (CEST)
THEY MADE IT? ohhhhhhhh MAN that's embarassing. Bitch slapped by their own paddle. A double edged sword indeed. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 00:25, 15 July 2007 (CEST)

FBFF

Not as efficient as Trapper?, it's bolony, it's fast/strong and fun to play not as fast as Trapper maybe but still efficient..

No it's not, trappers get the job done faster meaning you waste less time there and get through more rounds, so you can get back to REAL PvP. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 23:00, 12 July 2007 (CEST)

pff

time stamps are for idiets. - Skakid9090 18:48, 17 July 2007 (CEST)

heheh, noticed in time. Just don't forget to timestamp for people so it's easier to tell when expiry time is. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 19:08, 17 July 2007 (CEST)

 :/

Your edit here concerns me. Delete tags are not something to be placed lightly, and your entire reason behind it was vengeful, not helpful. Please re-think your purpose here on PvXwiki. -Auron 04:35, 20 July 2007 (CEST)

I understand your concern. Thing is, I'm not placing this in vengeance, I'm placing it because that build truly IS bad, and the author is even worse for 0-0-0ing a build which is only remotely similar. If he wants to say it's similar, say it on discussion page. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 15:45, 20 July 2007 (CEST)

Alliance

I could have sworn I saw a screenshot of you being in a guild that looked terribly similar to one of the guilds in my alliance (or my old alliance). Tycn 15:20, 20 July 2007 (CEST)

Please, tell me more. Which guild/alliance? ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 15:43, 20 July 2007 (CEST)

Vengeance

I may have had that coming but don't vandalize my page as seen here. I took responsibility for my actions and apologized to my peers. Don't be an ass.--Metal enchantment Metal Enchantment (talk · contributions) 20:44, 23 July 2007 (CEST)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.