Revision as of 21:15, August 26, 2010 by M.mendel (Talk | contribs)

| User:Oskar;
Oskar Archive

kay done--Oskar; 13:57, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

fuck now my watchlist is empty.--Oskar 14:08, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

why so many different user names? R U bipolar?--XTREME 18:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
Lol, bipolar means manic depressive. Schizophrenic would be what you meant, but I really don't think it functions like the stereotype says it does. ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 19:18, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
Edit raw watchlist then just copy over all the pages to your new user's watchlist ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 19:18, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
cheers! and x your dumb if bipolar meant dual personalities i'd be quad tri polar cause this is my fourth third--Oskar 19:21, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
No no no....I said bipolar....depressed enough to make multiple accounts to deflect negativity...not the fact that you have multiple--XTREME 20:49, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
niga u hilarys--Oskar 20:53, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
the fuck? :D ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 21:10, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Just a reminder, don't vote on any of the stuff your old accounts have =p. ~ PheNaxKian talk 22:00, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

if i want to change a vote from my old one i'll bug you until you remove the old one<3--Oskar 23:02, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
that works too <3 ~ PheNaxKian talk 23:19, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
steamy has joined the multiple personality syndrome group. congrats--Relyk talk 01:59, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Wait what the fuck ive just made an account called oskar and ive been signing as oskar for weeks and your still calling me steamy--Oskar 12:19, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Well yay. I'm still more fluctuating than most of the people on this site together, and I still have only one account! ^______^ ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 10:23, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Wait, that's not good, isn't it? ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 10:23, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Shut up Chaos Messenger. Frosty 10:33, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Haha, niggers - I'm back --Schoko Ze GermunDecap 11:37, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

your friendly neighborhood kraut is back guyzzzzzzThe preceding unsigned comment was added by Oskar; (talk • contribs) .
It's supposed to be "niggerhood kraut", paradox innit.--Schoko Ze Germun 12:29, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
lol schoko a nigger? nazi's cant be niggers. and thankyou x for correcting my mistake, i really should learn to sign my comments--Oskar 12:48, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

for the

u dun goof'd picture, go to

  • to to jessica slaughter
  • go to the bottem. its down there with some other epic ones.

--Bluetapeboy 19:09, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

fuck you--Oskar 01:28, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

I decided not to revert, when does the one day come?--Pirate 22:49, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

when you stop making comments like the one you just made--Oskar 23:00, August 10, 2010 (UTC)


spain until the 17th--Oskar 16:13, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Look ok?

c? I was feeling lazy and mostly just c+p'd mine, but it should be basically what your div was trying to do. Karate KJ for sig Jesus 00:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

my first edit in a week is to thank you for this, so kj, i thank you.--Oskar 18:56, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

HA Gas Chamber

No, I didn't do it. Why would you think of me? I don't do PvP much at all, neither does KISS. Juze JuzeAvatar 09:06, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

you know what he meant... --Novii 12:10, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
hi juice, how was your ban?--Oskar 18:57, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

The Header

Is supposed to be that way. It's called a subsection. Karate KJ for sig Jesus 16:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

ups my bad--Oskar 16:12, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

singing pigs

When I make a subsection, I do it because I want it to be a subsection, not because I like equals signs. Also, in a revision I made that was reverted, there are two nice videos of singing pigs. Your search&replace would destroy all that (though, as it stands, these vids will only resurface once the discussion is completely dead). Or do you have some nice videos of flying pigs? --◄mendel► 19:57, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

lol?--Oskar 00:31, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Sounding bureaucratic is no excuse for linking to a heap of bullshit ^_^ It was I who reverted the retarded pig videos, and no, I didn't even bother watching them <3
Also, subsections are fuckkkkkkkkkking ugly. It was a retarded topic in the first place. Now excuse me, Oskar is nearing his orgasm and I have work to do ;p --DANDY ^_^ -- 11:46, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
dsc<3--Oskar 11:49, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Nah, my excuse for linking to a heap of bullshit is that the discussion was dead anyway. And hey, singing pig. --◄mendel► 13:26, August 24, 2010 (UTC)


If somebody decided to build an exact copy of somebody (not clone, build) one atom at a time so it was EXACTLY the same, why would that body not be alive in the sense of thinking and breathing?--Oskar 01:57, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Pics or it didn't happen. ¬ Docta Rask Jenkins 02:32, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
amazing--Oskar 14:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
If you build it too slowly, the first part is dead by the time you finish the other end. ALSO, YOU'LL FUCK UP THE ELECTRONS ANYWAYS, BITCH, LRN QUANTUM MECHANICS --DANDY ^_^ -- 14:28, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not suggesting it from a practical point of view silly dandy!--Oskar 14:29, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
I like how you are trying to be deep and meaningful, but end up just sounding stupid with a rehashed discussion that has been going on for at least hundreds of years. See Mind-body dichotomy, Homonculus Philosophy of mind, Bodymind and w:Dualism (philosophy of mind). These articles only have passing relevance to the question you actually asked, but your question was dumb and bad and you should feel bad for asking it. Misery 15:05, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
funny you mention that, but i actually first asked that a week ago or so to dandy on msn out of boredom.--Oskar 15:21, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
Curious to see how that invalidates what I said. Misery 15:42, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
okay--Oskar 15:43, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
Is a copy ever the same as the original? Never.--XTREME 17:26, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
I'm a copy of the original... OR AM I?!?! Your point is now invalid. ¬ Docta Rask Jenkins 18:58, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
R U? now valid--XTREME 19:35, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
This is why we can't have nice things. ¬ Docta Rask Jenkins 19:52, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
wat--Oskar 21:16, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
You'd get either the location or the speed of the atoms wrong. --◄Heisenberg► 21:15, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.