FANDOM

(Difference between revisions) | User:Reason.decrystallized
m
(Build: N/any Discordant Technobabbler)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
== [[Build: N/any Discordant Technobabbler]] ==
 
== [[Build: N/any Discordant Technobabbler]] ==
 
Please reconsider your rating for the above build. To say that pain inverter and technobabble are bad is... well... just wrong. Also, your complaint about not using CoP is poorly thought out, as it is even listed in the variants, and as Technobabble and PI help out with discord, where as CoP doesn't as much. Also, Ether Nightmare on a necro primary is not great, as its got a big fat 3 sec cast time. Technobabble interrupts on cast and causes AoE daze... something which only one other skill in the game can do. Also, to rate something clearly effective with a 1 seems like you didn't think it through. Thanks. --[[Image:Bulldozer1.jpg|25px]] '''[[User:Captain Bulldozer|<font color="Blue">Captain Bulldozer </font>]]'''<font color = "Black" font size = 1>Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it.</font>''' 00:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 
Please reconsider your rating for the above build. To say that pain inverter and technobabble are bad is... well... just wrong. Also, your complaint about not using CoP is poorly thought out, as it is even listed in the variants, and as Technobabble and PI help out with discord, where as CoP doesn't as much. Also, Ether Nightmare on a necro primary is not great, as its got a big fat 3 sec cast time. Technobabble interrupts on cast and causes AoE daze... something which only one other skill in the game can do. Also, to rate something clearly effective with a 1 seems like you didn't think it through. Thanks. --[[Image:Bulldozer1.jpg|25px]] '''[[User:Captain Bulldozer|<font color="Blue">Captain Bulldozer </font>]]'''<font color = "Black" font size = 1>Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it.</font>''' 00:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  +
:you already have enfeebling blood for your condition, presumably your team has more. and PI is single-target reactive damage, making it vastly inferior to damn near everything. technobabble is still bleh--crappy damage and in PvE you don't need dazed, you just kill things. yeah, you have a functional main combo, but [http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/User:Reason.decrystallized/Why_having_a_broken_combo_in_a_functional_build_doesn%27t_mean_we_have_to_vote_it_high so does this]. Let's vet that, shall we? we already have far better implementations of the same build core on the site (and if we don't then it truly '''is''' dead), there's just no reason to keep around the inferior alternatives.--[[User:Reason.decrystallized|Reason.decrystallized]] 01:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:13, March 18, 2009

Archives
Archive 1 ~ ???? - Dec 10, 2008

First. -- Jebuscontests 20:07, 9 December 2008 (EST)

I made the page Build:A/D_Critical_Scythe_Assassin compliant with PvX:FORMAT and you changed it back to non-compliance. I recommend familiarizing yourself with PvX standards. --War_Pig5 15:46, 10 December 2008 (EST)

what you did was to rearrange the pvxbig tags so that the optional skills no longer gave skill descriptions on mouseover. i changed it back.--reason.decrystallized I frenzy-healsig. 17:03, 10 December 2008 (EST)

Please do not edit my build decrystallized. Just rate it, comment, and leave it. No right to edit my work. Build:A/Me Perm-SF Anywhere Runner. --- Blades of Valor 13:55, 13 December 2008 (EST)

not your build. and on the wiki, it's not your work. it's the community's.--reason.decrystallized I frenzy-healsig. 16:39, 13 December 2008 (EST)

Build:A/W Solo Palm Strike Spiker

please change your vote after palm strike's buff. it's quite a bit better.--IkimonoI know my ParagonsParagon-icon-small 22:23, 11 December 2008 (EST)

yeah i know. deleted vote, will vote again once we've established a new bar.--reason.decrystallized I frenzy-healsig. 22:35, 11 December 2008 (EST)

TBH

The A/D Zealous Assacaster was a reaction to W/A Endurance Assacaster, so your vote should be the other way around D: ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹPanic srsbsns 20:39, 23 December 2008 (EST)

ehm how so? the W/A one is a lot worse, though they are both pretty bad.--reason.decrystallized I frenzy-healsig. 20:41, 23 December 2008 (EST)
Nuh uh, zealous one is better, 5-5 it or urbad--Relyk chtistmas2ChristmasRelyk 21:22, 23 December 2008 (EST)

vandalism

Adding this to build pages constitutes vandalism. Don't do it again. -Auron 06:17, 24 December 2008 (EST)

imo that whole build constitutes vandalism.--reason.decrystallized I frenzy-healsig. 09:08, 24 December 2008 (EST)

Build: N/any Discordant Technobabbler

Please reconsider your rating for the above build. To say that pain inverter and technobabble are bad is... well... just wrong. Also, your complaint about not using CoP is poorly thought out, as it is even listed in the variants, and as Technobabble and PI help out with discord, where as CoP doesn't as much. Also, Ether Nightmare on a necro primary is not great, as its got a big fat 3 sec cast time. Technobabble interrupts on cast and causes AoE daze... something which only one other skill in the game can do. Also, to rate something clearly effective with a 1 seems like you didn't think it through. Thanks. --Bulldozer1 Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 00:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

you already have enfeebling blood for your condition, presumably your team has more. and PI is single-target reactive damage, making it vastly inferior to damn near everything. technobabble is still bleh--crappy damage and in PvE you don't need dazed, you just kill things. yeah, you have a functional main combo, but so does this. Let's vet that, shall we? we already have far better implementations of the same build core on the site (and if we don't then it truly is dead), there's just no reason to keep around the inferior alternatives.--Reason.decrystallized 01:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.