FANDOM

Archive 1

Archival

I undid your "wipe" of the page. I'm not sure if you were archiving/attempting to archive, but I'm not quite sure. Thus, I undid the revisions. If you want your page archived, just ask me. --GoD Wario Sig*Wah Wah Wah!* 08:28, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Made him an archive right before you added this :3 --Sazzy 08:29, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
Everyone look to my team build please (http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Build:Team_-_Lords_of_Death) and see if its ready to be tested tomorrow.robertjan 05:46, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

[1]

Respect PvX:ARCHIVE. Last warning. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 19:13, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

I removed that because:
  • 1. It has nothing to do with the build.
  • 2. Its total bullshit.
  • 3. She's almost always talking bullshit at my build and comment my grammar or my way of thinking (not the build itself), so I can't take her serious.
  • 4. Since its my own build located at my user name I may do with it whatever I want.robertjan 03:36, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
It sadly doesn't work like that Frosty No U! 02:26, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
Pitty it doesn't :Srobertjan 03:36, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

Your build

I moved it here for you already. --Ibreaktoilets SignatureTab Moo 07:58, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

Thanks.robertjan 07:58, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

Moving the talk page

don't do that again. Even if the discussion is over you shouldn't move the page and then wipe it. Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 08:02, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

Sry thought i moved the build page itself. But Tab already did that for me.robertjan 08:02, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
Also; why gamependium owns: [2], [3] and [4] Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 08:09, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
? What do you mean? I have many builds at gamependium (also the A/E perma sf runner, which i already used and placed it there 2 months before the release of the perma update and the build on pvx -used it because you only had 4 sec downtime, cause I couldn't work with the A/Me perma-)robertjan 08:11, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
I mean what I said - gamependium owns. Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 08:20, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
Ah k but why :). Do you have also builds there? or was it sarcasm?robertjan 08:27, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

Fixed this again for Build:A/W Shattering Impale. Please pay attention to which page you're moving. --Toraen 11:33, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

When doing

Minor edits to pages, would you mind checking the "This is a minor edit" box? Thanks. - Snow White Tan1 S W T 08:41, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

What does it do?robertjan 09:17, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
The edit will not show up in Recent Changes. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 09:21, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
Ah k. I will try to do that next time.robertjan 09:24, 18 July 2008 (EDT)


Check

Could people who see this please look at my team-build located here ?

ell oh ell

"Only recommend this in AB. Snare and increased run speed are useless in RA and Ta. Also Power attack instead of Protector's Strike is much better cause you also will deal extra damage if the foe isn't moving." I actually lol'd IRL. Treat it as a GvG build that CAN work in other areas. Power Attack, I mean wow, it just shit. Speed Boost is never bad in sort if PvP and is pretty much needed on a frontliner. Frosty No U! 03:44, 20 July 2008 (EDT)

Power attack is 100% better then that other skill he uses. No 0.5 sec cast time and always the + damage and not only vs moving foes. It also has the same recharge and energy cost so its better. And Snare and Increased run speed in RA and TA? Almost never saw that before....I also rated it in that way cause it isn't THAT good if you look at other melee build for those pvp area's. Also Attacker's Insight is useless in that build, better use Zealous Renewal to end up with far more energy management. robertjan 03:47, 20 July 2008 (EDT)
Good point about Zealous Renewal, but I don't think you know why protector's Strike is used. It is used to quickly activate the DW provided by Wounding Strike, because it is quick activation it means it can produce and a quick spike. Power Attack sucks, Especially on a non warrior primary. Frosty No U! 03:57, 20 July 2008 (EDT)
But why is protector's Strike better then power atack here? Power attack is also faster since it hasn't an activasion time :), it has same recharge and energy cost. And you will always deal the +10 dmg on top of that, so why not using this skill.robertjan 04:01, 20 July 2008 (EDT)
No, if it has NO activation time it means it uses normal scythe attack speed, wanna know what that is? 1.75. Protector's is 0.5, and the + damage doesn't mean all that when your attacks deal fucking imba damage any way. Frosty No U! 04:05, 20 July 2008 (EDT)
Ah k. then i remove that part of my comment but the rating stays si nce its not that good.robertjan 04:15, 20 July 2008 (EDT)
And it's using Zealous Renewal btw, thus the last part of your vote in un-neccessary Frosty No U! 04:17, 20 July 2008 (EDT)
Since you changed that now yes. K I will count 1 point more now for effectiveness, cuase its better now.robertjan 04:18, 20 July 2008 (EDT)

^jo

Lold. You can also, like, start a page in the Build: namespace, so you don't have to move em... (and no, the link in the header makes no sense) --84.24.206.123 10:02, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

<3

that you spelled Trial wrong :) Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 09:35, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

Build:W/Any Dwarven Stance

Has been moved to Build:W/any Dwarven Stance as per PvX:NAME. Stop failing xD I is *Jebus*IAmJebussig3Enter my contest! 23:09, 9 August 2008 (EDT)

WELL tags

"Do not remove this tag from builds you authored unless a consensus has been reached on the talk page." A direct quote from the WELL tag. Don't remove WELL tags unless a concensus is reached, and by a concensus I mean a group of people, not you. Even then, someone else usually should/will remove it, not an author. --GoD Wario Sig*Wah Wah Wah!* 21:31, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

[5]

Please read it. Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 09:34, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

I think he knows that by now. His front page is filled with builds atm. Probably didn't even notice he wrote it wrong :3 şąɀɀƴƿooɧPinkNautical 09:36, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
What?robertjan 09:38, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
He means your naming of Build:Spear_of_teh_Beast şąɀɀƴƿooɧPinkNautical 09:43, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

Article Ownership

Please read it regarding your fighting about this build. Realize that there is no yours or his build once it's been added to PvX. Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 07:55, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.