FANDOM


robertjan 10:24, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Because it isn't as good. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 10:24, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Why not its faster then the other combi with rank 0 deldrimor (which gives 30% increase stance) Without dash this would be (20sec x 25%/30)=+16.6% overall. With dash 2x which gives 6 sec of 50% faster in the rest of the downtime to fill the 30 seconds gives total: 20x25%+6x50%=800/30= +26 2/3% increased runspeed overall. My armor of mist is: (22sec x 33%)/23 (1 sec cast and 0.4 sec down=1 sec)=+31.6% overall increased runspeed.So Aom gives more overall if you haven't a high deldrimor rank.robertjan 10:25, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

We assume people don't suck and can get a little Deldrimor ranking here. Build should be based on the assumption everyone has all skills unlocked the best equipment and maximum rank. - Miserysig1isery -TALK 10:28, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
GG, Misery. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 10:28, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Lolz so you need max rank and what do you do with people that haven't eotn ot havne't time to get a high rank? cause deldimor takes time and is not so eay as norn. Altough the pending deletion reason isn't fair cause it has 4 diffrent skills. So may i know who sets it on pending deletion the whole time without any reason? Is that hate?robertjan 10:31, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

PvX=Elitest=Don't care about people who can't be assed getting to at least rank 2 (which is where the existing build beats the Armor of Mist version). The Armor of Mist version isn't tagged under WELL as a dupe, it's tagged under WELL as inferior while being very similar and fulfilling the same purpose. If it can do something the other build cannot do, now is the time to mention it. Check history to see who tagged it, then read the WELL policy, they were fully justified in their actions in my opinion, but deletion will be up to an admin. - Miserysig1isery -TALK 10:35, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

WELL tags

"Do not remove this tag from builds you authored unless a consensus has been reached on the talk page." A direct quote from the WELL tag. Constantly removing it may result in bans or such. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 10:41, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

NP but there isn't any reason to remove my build.....robertjan 10:42, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

It's for an admin/the community to decide, not consensus of one. If you want to make a case for not deleting the build, make it on the build's talk page and it will be reviewed before deletion. - Miserysig1isery -TALK 10:51, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Final Warning

Stop removing WELL tags. You have been reverted by me and Tab. I have posted it on the Admin Noticeboard. It clearly explains on the WELL tag that you CANNOT remove a WELL tag until a concensus is reached on the Talk page, which one has not (and if so, the favortism leans towards the build being deleted). --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 10:49, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

E/A Shadowy Sliver

Has been moved to Build:E/A Shadowy Sliver. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 17:58, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

[1]

Completely altering a vetted build is vandalism, and vandalism is bad. --71.229 06:09, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, not a good idea.--Goldenstar 06:26, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Damn something is going wrong. I had used a part of the text of this build for my build, but i thoink i added this build again instead of mine. sryrobertjan 06:35, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Ah i see what the problem was I 'ctrl v' my text into this build instead of in my own Rr/Me expel build.robertjan 06:39, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Oh and THOU SHALT NOT REMOVE COMMENTS FROM TALK PAGES! kk? - Misery Is Hawt19px 05:59, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

But talk page is personal i thought...or am i wrongrobertjan 06:58, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

Incorrect, talk pages have rules, user space is personal, you can go nuts there, but I wouldn't go posting hardcore porn or anything. - Misery Is Hawt19px 07:00, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
I would... the companion cube = hardcore pr0n ;o Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 07:03, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
"There is a simple, all-encompassing rule that should be followed when editing Discussion pages. Never, ever edit, delete, or strike out another user's comments. While all users are free to edit or retract their statements, censoring another's comments in any manner is considered a policy violation." ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 21:33, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

Sockpuppetry

Is not a wise thing to do. Warning given, next time permablock. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 07:38, 7 July 2008 (EDT)

I didn't make more then 1 email adresses. That isn't even possible for 1 ip adres so far as i know so please stfu. or ban me i don't mind......robertjan 02:28, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Point of Trial

You stated that you didn't see a point in Trial phases. These are here so you can prevent your build from being voted on while it is still work, ps, the build I submitted was in trial long before you re-vamped the original. /FrosTalk\ 06:00, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

5 min totally, cause i ctrl paste that line into my build and changed it to testing after i changed some text :). But lets stop this discussion :Probertjan 06:01, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Other one

If you are going to use this account, I will permablock the other. Is it alright? ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 07:23, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Well since i use always this accoun bt as you can see :P but maybe you could also delete this account also with his builds and commends cause i want to quit using pvxwiki...robertjan 07:55, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
If you want to quit, just stop visiting. Builds/accounts/comments won't be deleted. --Sazzy 08:00, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Since no account belonged to [[User talk:Robarjan]] I moved the discussion there. Also, PvX:ARCHIVE and PvX:REDIRECT. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 08:10, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

S i changed my account na,me with move.....robertjan 08:14, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
Moving your talkpage is not equal to changing your account. To do so, log out and create a new one. And do not blank your talkpage, archive it. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 08:18, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.