FANDOM


(Something about the way people vote is bugging me.: new section)
m (Something about the way people vote is bugging me.)
Line 43: Line 43:
   
 
People seem to ignore the way effectiveness and universality are separate and just use them to create the overall rating they believe is correct (5, 4.8, 4.2, 3.8 etc) rather than actually considering how effective it is and how universal it is. For example, if a build is very easy to use and relatively effective, people think, its not perfect but its worth the great catagory, i will 5-4 it. That is NOT correct, it is a 4-5 build due to 4/5 effectiveness and 5/5 universality.--[[User:Oskar|<font color="black">Oskar</font>]] 14:50, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
 
People seem to ignore the way effectiveness and universality are separate and just use them to create the overall rating they believe is correct (5, 4.8, 4.2, 3.8 etc) rather than actually considering how effective it is and how universal it is. For example, if a build is very easy to use and relatively effective, people think, its not perfect but its worth the great catagory, i will 5-4 it. That is NOT correct, it is a 4-5 build due to 4/5 effectiveness and 5/5 universality.--[[User:Oskar|<font color="black">Oskar</font>]] 14:50, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:you best be trolling[[image:Unreal_sig_1.png‎ ]] 15:38, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:38, July 2, 2010

Oskar Archive
ARCHIVES

wat the fack my sig has reset itself--Steamy Igloo 14:38, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

k fix'd--Oskar 14:38, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Lol I've inspired random custom archives? ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 14:39, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

wat? i archived mine before juzes--Oskar 14:39, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
lol. that totally changes the fact that I think I've had a great share in inspiring the use of custom archive names. ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 17:50, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Stuck-up prick. :3 --Short 17:52, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Ever since I closed my RfA I haven't had many serious discussion on this wiki. This doesn't count as one, and despite my asshattery and hostile tone on Smity's talk, I'm rly just trolling him too ^__^ ---Chaos- (moo!) -- 18:50, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
nigger--Oskar 21:39, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Fuck you all, first!

Yes, rite--Schoko Ze GermunDecap 15:48, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

No. Vincent Evan [Air Henchman] Vincels 15:51, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
nigger etc--Oskar 15:56, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Better than gw

http://www.adamatomic.com/canabalt/ seriously its the most addictive game ever and it only uses 1 button--Oskar 00:04, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Bored after 3 tries. Zyke-Sig 00:09, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
How far did you get? And bored after 3 tries doesnt stop it being less boring than gw--Oskar 00:10, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
True. I died to the godzilla popping out of nowhere. Zyke-Sig 00:16, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
You mean the car falling from the sky. Its a city being demolished lol... And i meant like what distance it tells you how far you got--Oskar 00:25, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

when will pvx update skills description

its quite annoying to watch the builds on wiki and cant get the point because of outdated skills description --ComeOnItsMe 08:57, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

It's updated whenever we bug wikia enough that they update it. Life Guardian 08:58, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
thankyou for letting me know, i never realised that pvx did not have up to date skill descriptions and i am just the right person to talk to if you want them updated.--Oskar 12:09, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
Lolz. I'll email TOR again and see if he cbf'd. Karate KJ for sig Jesus 13:50, 2 July 2010
Couldn't you just ask if the admins could have access to the database? Or has that already been asked? --Samsig 13:52, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
It's been asked....more times than I could count. TOR's boss refuses to give us access. The best he could get is a copy of the db for us. As long as it's accurate, it wont be hard for him to do, though. Karate KJ for sig Jesus 13:55, 2 July 2010

who the hell is TOR?--Oskar 14:05, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

Something about the way people vote is bugging me.

People seem to ignore the way effectiveness and universality are separate and just use them to create the overall rating they believe is correct (5, 4.8, 4.2, 3.8 etc) rather than actually considering how effective it is and how universal it is. For example, if a build is very easy to use and relatively effective, people think, its not perfect but its worth the great catagory, i will 5-4 it. That is NOT correct, it is a 4-5 build due to 4/5 effectiveness and 5/5 universality.--Oskar 14:50, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

you best be trollingUnreal sig 1 15:38, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.