{My Userpage}
[ Archive 1 // Archive 2 // Archive 3 // Archive 4 ]
It is currently: 07/9/2020 21:51

Heh, I have no clue how to archive....--Teh Uber Pwnzer 08:33, 31 August 2007 (CEST)

Leet Build

Internets coupon

For the leetest build evar

You win 10 internets. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲShield of Deflection 05:59, 3 September 2007 (CEST)
uh, thanks?--Teh Uber Pwnzer 06:49, 3 September 2007 (CEST)


Can't have blinking in it. According, to PvX:SIGN. ~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 22:31, 16 September 2007 (CEST)

...just when I made my new sig too! I was about to ask on Readem's talk page if PvX:SIGN was approved too. I'm guessing it is and ill change it I guess.--Teh Uber Pwnzer 22:33, 16 September 2007 (CEST)
Ugh, Ive gotta get rid of it completely, cuz of the stupid SUBST thing. I just wanted it to chow up as {{User:Teh Uber Pwnzer/Template:Sig}}, but instead it shows up as '''<font color="black"><span style="text-decoration:blink;">[[User:Teh Uber Pwnzer|<font color="black">--</font><font color="#3F3">T</font><font color="#0F3">e</font><font color="#3F0">h </font>]][[User_Talk:Teh Uber Pwnzer|<font color="#0F0">U</font><font color="#3C0">b</font><font color="#0C0">e</font><font color="#393">r </font>]][[Special:Contributions/Teh_Uber_Pwnzer|<font color="#093">P</font><font ''color="#390">w</font><font color="#090">n</font><font color="#360">z</font><font color="#063">e</font><font color="#060">r</font>]] </span></font>''' when editing.


Sorry about that. Didn't know sharing build names would have that effect ^_^

Np, and sign your comments with 4 tildes(~~~~).--Teh Uber Pwnzer 00:43, 19 September 2007 (CEST)

Lyssas Fury

I removed RA tag.--§ Eloc § 18:21, 23 September 2007 (CEST)

Changed my vote. --Teh Uber Pwnzer 21:11, 23 September 2007 (CEST)


sorta hard to vote when you use a template. - Rawrawr 13:58, 7 October 2007 (CEST)

SHIT IM RETARDED - Rawrawr 13:59, 7 October 2007 (CEST)
I'm guessing you found the (vote here) thing? --Teh Uber Pwnzer 23:08, 7 October 2007 (CEST)

I am iz bored!!!

comment. --Teh Uber Pwnzer 02:03, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

AH! MY EYES!!! TOO... BIG... LETTERS!!!!! --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 02:27, 18 October 2007 (CEST)


Don't mark expired grace period pages for deletion, Special:GraceexpiredSkakid9090 22:47, 28 October 2007 (CET)

alright. Didn't know. Sorry.--Teh Uber Pwnzer
not really a big deal, but it floods candidates for deletion with things that don't need to be there — Skakid9090 22:53, 28 October 2007 (CET)


Please don't do it. It's just spam. If people are going to notice things, it's going to be when they log in and check their watchlist/recent changes. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 23:45, 30 October 2007 (CET)

Alright. Just a question, why did you put this here? This is just my awesome template that Auron removed. --Teh Uber Pwnzer 00:49, 31 October 2007 (CET)
Um, because I apparently fail at putting things on real talk pages. Will move. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 02:05, 31 October 2007 (CET)
So moved. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 02:06, 31 October 2007 (CET)

Stance Sin

just a bit harsh? i beat all sorts of sins all the time with that build =/ and its just RA/AB...i dont see how it deserves a 1 in effectiveness..i realize its not a super awesome build but cut me some slack -Karmapolice 02:57, 4 November 2007 (CET)

Also, why are you bringing up evis in pve? Tycn 02:59, 4 November 2007 (CET)

cause evis is teh gud. --Teh Uber Pwnzer 03:06, 4 November 2007 (CET)
Even that axe ranger is better with the AoE. Also, my bad on the paragon, forgot about gfte nerf. Tycn 03:14, 4 November 2007 (CET)

In PvE... you can't really compare a an Evis Warrior to builds of other Primaries... whether or not the Warrior would deal more damage, you play with what you've got in PvE, it's not like PvP where you instantly have access to whichever profession is best suited for the task. You're also comparing builds that don't even necessarily focus on damage to an Evis Warrior... =/. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:33, 4 November 2007 (CET)

Tell grinch that. I was a little pissed off when I voted down all those builds, but what I said was mostly true. Anyways, I'm over it and already working on another other-category build. Double edit conflict ftl btw. --Teh Uber Pwnzer 04:37, 4 November 2007 (CET)
I've removed many of them... at least the ones that referred to non-Warrior PvE builds, you can argue the validity of individual votes, but overall, those votes are semi-ludicrous, and I know that I removed at least one of Grinsh's as well. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:49, 4 November 2007 (CET)


Lol, me and DE are psychic
double pwned. ~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 04:35, 4 November 2007 (CET)

New Sig

Discuss. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 06:20, 5 November 2007 (CET)

Vietnamese :o Hammer And Sickle۷ïεדИǺмЄŠЄ 06:24, 5 November 2007 (CET)

Stupid fucking rules...

Teh uber pwnzer.. you make me sad. Make me hide my wonderful comments from you? T_T Buh-but.. I loved writing pointless things on your wall! Cedave bad cedave (contributions_buildpage) 03:24, 7 November 2007 (CET)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.